Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
"Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso@cisco.com> Thu, 28 April 2011 21:47 UTC
Return-Path: <sethomso@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5902E073E for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhkbCSyhyG2R for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1914E06A6 for <nea@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sethomso@cisco.com; l=1864; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1304027223; x=1305236823; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:from:to; bh=yqTifNGGKil+ZHB0IozquOgMs9l9EKTfm2F4IbCI+3c=; b=ERb3a2XrlsPOIx3IQtxGmJD5OcMlSnIuk6VT9gKHPMFb3kvP84e0FLaC aOAzdbWePDb7QNB0t77gr2CPw27ErZGlqHYI78AZaf9MQUduupFz7rtBE fbaZjWcnqllP4VZjaplHQsXp16XdUXKgGngvyOoz5H8auJK853ZeBq+sk 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUBAFTfuU2tJV2c/2dsb2JhbACYCj+NOXenboEdnRKFdgSGCYxwigw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,283,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="231756309"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2011 21:47:03 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3SLl2eh011303 for <nea@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:47:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-105.cisco.com ([72.163.62.147]) by xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:47:02 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:46:59 -0500
Message-ID: <043901FAFD488D44ACC9CCED00470BDC04DAAA68@XMB-RCD-105.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
Thread-Index: Acv4rz3tc1/J9hl0R9y+k9A9ge1wCgLtQvEg
From: "Susan Thomson (sethomso)" <sethomso@cisco.com>
To: nea@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Apr 2011 21:47:02.0366 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEE8E7E0:01CC05ED]
Subject: Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:47:04 -0000
I counted 5 responses to the consensus check question on next steps re the L3-based PT protocols. All responded in the affirmative. I declare consensus to merge the TLS/TCP-based protocols into one submission as described. The co-authors can go ahead with publishing a merged proposal. Thanks Susan -----Original Message----- From: Susan Thomson (sethomso) Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:16 PM To: nea@ietf.org Subject: Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TCP-based PT At IETF80, there was a discussion on next steps regarding the individual submissions for a TLS/TCP-based PT, and an EAP-based PT. Specifically, there are 2 proposals for a TLS/TCP-based transport documented in the following I-Ds: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sangster-nea-pt-tls-02.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cam-winget-eap-tlv-03.txt At the meeting, there was unanimous consensus to merge the TLS/TCP proposals in the above I-Ds as follows: - Support client authentication using the SASL framework - Support vendor extensions - Support error handling The authors of the above I-Ds have agreed to work on a joint WG submission. The chairs would like to verify this consensus on the mailing list. Please review the proposal and respond by Monday, 5pm PT on Apr 18. Indicate in your response whether you support the changes. If you support the changes, a one word response ("Support") is sufficient. If not, please explain your concerns and suggest how they could be resolved. Thanks Susan ---------------------------- Note: No consensus has yet been reached on the EAP-based proposals, in particular, whether to use an EAP method or EAP-TLV for carrying posture information. The next step is to document the strengths and weaknesses of these 2 approaches to help make a decision.
- [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TLS/TC… Susan Thomson (sethomso)
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… Stefan Winter
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… Stephen Hanna
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… latze
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… Kent_Landfield
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… Ira McDonald
- Re: [Nea] Verifying consensus on next steps re TL… Susan Thomson (sethomso)