[nemo] RO between MR and CN
Tânia Pinto Calçada <tcalcada@inescporto.pt> Wed, 13 October 2004 12:08 UTC
Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18876 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHhlr-0001i6-S1; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:58:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHh6y-0007YG-SR for nemo@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:16:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14147 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:15:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from animal.inescn.pt ([192.35.246.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHhHo-000235-PA for nemo@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:27:18 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by animal.inescn.pt (8.12.10/8.12.11/19) with ESMTP id i9DBFjMI011186; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:15:45 +0100 (WEST)
Received: from yang.inescn.pt (yang.inescn.pt [194.117.24.169]) by animal.inescn.pt (8.12.10/8.12.10/7) with ESMTP id i9DBFbd1011165; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:15:38 +0100 (WEST)
Received: from nicles (nicles.inescn.pt [194.117.24.79]) by yang.inescn.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEB570168; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:15:37 +0100 (WEST)
From: Tânia Pinto Calçada <tcalcada@inescporto.pt>
To: nemo@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:15:38 +0100
Organization: INESC Porto
Message-ID: <000d01c4b115$f7d57e90$451975c2@inescn.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01C4B11E.5999E690"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at inescporto.pt
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1924de3f9fb68e58c31920136007eb1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:58:17 -0400
Cc: pthubert@cisco.com
Subject: [nemo] RO between MR and CN
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tcalcada@inescporto.pt
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, I am interested in route optimization between the MR and the CN. I read the taxonomy draft (draft-thubert-nemo-ro-taxonomy-02.txt), and several other documents related to RO: draft-jeong-nemo-ro-ndproxy-02.txt draft-leekj-nemo-ro-pd-02.txt draft-na-nemo-gen-ro-model-00.txt draft-na-nemo-path-control-header-00.txt draft-wakikawa-nemo-orc-00.txt ROProblem.txt I also read some threads of the NEMO mailing list <http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nemo/current/index.html> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nemo/current/index.html, however I am still looking for a document that describes a solution for the RO between the MR and the CN. The taxonomy draft says at section 2: A major issue with this form of optimization is that the end-to-end principle of the MIPv6 Reverse Routability (RR) test is broken. The RR test is meant to ensure the care-of address (CoA) and the home address (HoA) are collocated. With a mobile network, when the MR performs RO on behalf of the MNNs, the CoA in BU will be the MR's CoA. Thus, a MNN is reachable via the CoA, but not at the CoA. Some tricks may be performed on the fly by the MRs but it seems that a clean MR-to-CN optimization for Nemo will impact the CN function. Can somebody point the tricks that may be performed, or indicate a document that explores this subject? Regards, Tania Calcada
- [nemo] RO between MR and CN Tânia Pinto Calçada
- [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] RO between MR and CN Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: archives about RO and mobile networks (was: [… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] RO between MR and CN Tania Pinto Calcada
- Re: [nemo] RO between MR and CN Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Masafumi Watari
- How to read the NEMO archives (was Re: archives a… T.J.Kniveton
- Re: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- RE: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN marcelo bagnulo braun
- About RRH security (was Re: [nemo] RE: RO between… marcelo bagnulo braun
- RE: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- RE: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- RE: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Masafumi Watari
- RE: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [nemo] RE: RO between MR and CN Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano