[nemo] RE: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document

Raj,
    We do want to solve the IPv4 traversal, however NAT/PAT
traversal support is the critical requirement for that.
Based on our Mobile IPv4 deployment experience, we have seen
lot of interest for NAT Traversal and MIPv4 WG standardised
on RFC 3519. The same requirement is central to the problem
statement here.

   On your question, if we can adopt draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel
as the basis for the solution, my answer to that is "NO". There
are other solution documents out there and we need to review
them as well.

Regards.
Sri

On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:

>
> A couple of clarifications regarding the consensus call:
>
> 1. The intention is to address the following scenario:
> "MIPv6 and NEMO capable Mobile hosts/routers attaching to an IPv4
> access network need the capability to create a tunnel and be connected
> to their MIP6 home agents."
> This is the scenario that is most applicable for MIP6 deployment.
> There are plenty of other scenarios as well. But they are much more
> of academic interest at this time and hence not really in the scope
> of this discussion. So I would suggst that we do not go off on a tangent
> discussing all these other scenarios.
>
> Do you agree/disagree that the above scenario is the one that needs
> to be solved ASAP?
> (Note: It does not imply that other scenarios are irrelevant. It simply
> means that this is the scenario worth working on and has the most
> significant priority or value for MIP6 deployment.)
>
> 2. ID:  draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel can be used as the baseline. It
> does not imply that we are ruling out draft-soliman-v4v6-mipv6 or any
> other. The IDs can be combined w.r.t the parts that address this scenario.
> Additionally once it is a WG document, what goes into the ID is decided
> by the WG. So lets not get into arguments of what or whose draft is the
> one that should be made the WG document.
>
> -Basavaraj
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mip6 mailing list
> Mip6@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
>