Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document

Alexandru Petrescu <Alexandru.Petrescu@motorola.com> Fri, 01 April 2005 09:18 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA05161 for <nemo-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:18:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DHIFA-0004jy-K1; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:15:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DHIF2-0004iL-Q0; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:15:00 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA04936; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:14:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ftpbox.mot.com ([129.188.136.101]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DHIMK-0001Lj-7i; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:22:33 -0500
Received: from az33exr02.mot.com (az33exr02.mot.com [10.64.251.232]) by ftpbox.mot.com (Motorola/Ftpbox) with ESMTP id j319ElA2022955; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 02:14:48 -0700 (MST)
Received: from zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com (zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com [10.161.201.8]) by az33exr02.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j319FQUH029365; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 03:15:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [10.161.201.117] (zfr01-2117.crm.mot.com [10.161.201.117]) by zfr01srv02.crm.mot.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C170865980; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <424D1104.4090000@motorola.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:14:44 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <Alexandru.Petrescu@motorola.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [nemo] Re: [Mip6] Consensus call on making ID draft-wakikawa-nemo-v4tunnel a MIP6/NEMO WGs document
References: <456943D540CFC14A8D7138E64843F8535BAD25@daebe101.NOE.Nokia.com> <424C3EF8.5050507@levkowetz.com> <424C5733.103@iprg.nokia.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0503311354430.25110@irp-view8.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0503311354430.25110@irp-view8.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nemo@ietf.org, mip6@ietf.org, Vijay Devarapalli <vijayd@iprg.nokia.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sri Gundavelli wrote:
> We have implementations based on draft-thubert-nemo-ipv4-traversal
> and some good thinking went in to that proposal and it is
> important that we review all these solutions in the context
> of the agreed upon problem space.

We also have an implementation but it is not documented, however, 
experiments were reported on Section 3 of expired draft 
draft-lach-nemo-experiments-overdrive-01.txt http://tinyurl.com/3om6x

It uses IPv6 in UDPv4 for NAT traversal.  The HA and the Gateway are not 
co-located.

That does not use IPv4 CoA for MIP6 simply because when behind NAT it's 
little relevant.

It uses UDP port scanning to find out open ports and 15s icmp "heart 
beats" to maintain port state unchnaged in the NAT devices.

When sending big packets over asymmetric wireless links (like GPRS and 
UMTS) the v4 stack fragments but the v6 stack does not fragment.

Alex