IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] netconf-binary-encoding comments

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BC7130E97 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePZHm8YktI5i for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A971130E6C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m12-v6so10410688lfc.10 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mTkLF+PwDd3TBreOh5/0kVyr3Dr/NOGFt34eUXHZS4g=; b=bu0W/gqOEzcVhFAiRuDqi8EBFDFn98MATAsajyPkZwFAZvsIwrAriinIydAQFTimn1 +b55HRYPTmd+WjUXofKIIk70QDH1UkfoBHb3IX6908b8zafqU1Ne4soP7dvn9WjdanlO LmFHBTa5biGuy2aKlwYI1XFcEsOv8+nRtfmApnpm8UCXNUHpaHkQ8Pfm38bWSUgcf+Mo /mqFdAkDbaopz/4/+5RpW34qSNnPL+ocxM6+AY9jHyngOwO/1QagjBJkbhdljmoG701I cKciyz5HeBK5nrwmk9YmWf6IHgOpaZMnvjgM8Qe+NVZGsMyAsC5mpWTnZ1MZoWVZ2hYD ddTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mTkLF+PwDd3TBreOh5/0kVyr3Dr/NOGFt34eUXHZS4g=; b=VowSOmLXZ6B8qvxHyvWA95RwMC+2IE1mk3NRDEr1lWvhqa0w6ViywyiFeGxsVsHetp i/gOWar+wWjZfQDQjMi+cWlby5jTW+asadpHj218rPdTFT3V9D9yFJDFYK9p/pe4Nxa5 vAozYPE1AlzaAl9NM+eNqVXwpVYxJCtHOyw+G3jeGVsIME4SPq1XcRrnuRITr1R8W7Bu WrmBulpkt4tVM5U4iP4OPBfueSxUnKfPxCPpthIkgvJU080Kzg7o/vQX+tElCr3tIIkY /Ip2TD16l7piMuzAYfHynTWPL5k6MooxlQUfw5MiErGLg3ggzW1MmfDn5aM79kOpJKmX 64lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1w4RykYgNzcIhPBwDdhf/V9thBhXB3CAWOiTNH18ZzXUw0ihru p4S3C9V+G3rXQ+GgpzSOHUGLsMLqOg/6qPx6Ge3SXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfBuf85AvbkI9hsq210eCYqq/WhK+95y3NOLpXwb5c0M5cv5QY6qLMOpelCewHqntFV88huU/ayQBbviEw+zcY=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:d819:: with SMTP id p25-v6mr2217944lfg.36.1530898931936; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:aa46:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20180706172308.5ro5cjv3x7ujopsx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <14395e68-eb71-7766-d4d2-4de0ea67681f@ericsson.com> <CABCOCHRJM5vTgTXcNircjcn6DCqK5fzW3E2rjMM6sb3A3Edz_g@mail.gmail.com> <79d3af9b-dd0c-833b-491f-a25a54a38559@cisco.com> <CABCOCHQfwND7uezS_ykQ4G-v_JPNqTx0Pw3hJVqTVB83XqJgzw@mail.gmail.com> <d6109edb-d54d-2e58-d830-6410f1a22013@cisco.com> <20180706172308.5ro5cjv3x7ujopsx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 10:42:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTj0FTzC6_96dgo8MYnPowWSqF5HRy-eU3nPvRzVLVS5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000684190570582f09"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/-WWvmAxdyGQNvfX3yeuCKbHyZqE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] netconf-binary-encoding comments
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:42:17 -0000

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
> >
> > My consideration was more: where should the NETCONF WG be spending its
> > effort?
> >
>
> So is there running code? Who is doing binary NETCONF and who is doing
> binary RESTCONF? What are the _measured_ (not expected) savings with
> binary NETCONF and binary RESTCONF? If all the running code moving
> binary values is neither NETCONF nor RESTCONF, why would we spent
> effort to extend NETCONF so that it can support multiple encodings?
> Are people eager to migrate from what they use to this new solution?
>
>

Working on binary (gNMI).
Very interested in CBOR+SID as a better solution.
The NETCONF WG is done wrt/ RESTCONF.
CORE WG will standardize YANG to CBOR and SID.
Seems like any use of CBOR in NETCONF, YANG Push, or RESTCONF
is gated on the completion of these RFCs.




> /js
>
>

Andy


> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email