IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] netconf-binary-encoding comments

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Sat, 07 July 2018 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F443130DD5; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUNXNEeOHpMA; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E392B131071; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w67055Df028926; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 17:05:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=W1vZVUDwDbCoG6ifRFXWPCeNmK/yYE9fYAwML5PVZd8=; b=aGhFDCfZmvycNH9W9Na8ezXmXVe8cILrUeEUHRmB0RWFO/xvi9c90TMFRF0eYtGbL7Eb YRWR8+6uUeRt3bsh2d1zTwGHE4RSzSLvXRLqngblORosO9ZBXZYMIcai7KczSO5urmc0 Gn/zkYRNyVg21WJwCX0kB25leEmVgJs4LlMgEpp4RfHiX96MxveEsOn1XaoH1ZWFa2pp rTiWBnLAW6djCFYMraXBOTnNV3QfcU62K4xCG/B1RFXgzn5Syi4LrF4gwxE9g97sbiGF PSgaHe2O1zaToGc4zNby/HBeh5IYXIDwAuW71unX8EsPSIyy9gEKtak9XyPPhAQjxmff PQ==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.48]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k2392hqpt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:05:04 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB4934.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.235.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.952.7; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:05:02 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0952.008; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:05:02 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
CC: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Robert Wilton <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] netconf-binary-encoding comments
Thread-Index: AQHUFHIFG5dr9N8THkC50o178ISxIaSAy4aAgAEgB4CAAHApgIAACu4AgAAMewCAAAVRAP//7oaAgAB0xgD//8ScAA==
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:05:02 +0000
Message-ID: <E57B965F-F572-418A-B600-3AC150C06894@juniper.net>
References: <14395e68-eb71-7766-d4d2-4de0ea67681f@ericsson.com> <CABCOCHRJM5vTgTXcNircjcn6DCqK5fzW3E2rjMM6sb3A3Edz_g@mail.gmail.com> <79d3af9b-dd0c-833b-491f-a25a54a38559@cisco.com> <CABCOCHQfwND7uezS_ykQ4G-v_JPNqTx0Pw3hJVqTVB83XqJgzw@mail.gmail.com> <d6109edb-d54d-2e58-d830-6410f1a22013@cisco.com> <20180706172308.5ro5cjv3x7ujopsx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <CABCOCHTj0FTzC6_96dgo8MYnPowWSqF5HRy-eU3nPvRzVLVS5w@mail.gmail.com> <70874365-9182-413D-8FD5-927941DA7E08@juniper.net> <CABCOCHS=YEP_7EC8kxU=72f-swd8wP_ixV4rfk2CG1KGtfL6jQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHS=YEP_7EC8kxU=72f-swd8wP_ixV4rfk2CG1KGtfL6jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4934; 7:Tf4sr0sXU+igPpQEZy7SxadyeEezISgC7tnuGVrD/egLuFP2Ve/qqwWzCT4ILTif62UFW5VypAaKynYuGH50FwSGjwgpaeEEniWuG57DjCvkVBOovi+taAJY5mqOhELFWap/rZaWSFk8mokitmHJ8kYmoJoJczgewzJUkvnmDSjQVJIJeSnsD5kPxV4O7ZwrC4DBIzfhmztievpoH2nbKgjB4m5L3pa8FG7Nk6LULWCQQeLxlHTh34T878Xs6nKq
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a850be66-7acc-4b0b-7fa1-08d5e39d49ac
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4934;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4934:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB493449957F3EF57FD57DDA1FA5460@BYAPR05MB4934.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(21748063052155);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4934; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4934;
x-forefront-prvs: 0726B2D7A6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(2906002)(54906003)(6436002)(82746002)(76176011)(6486002)(3846002)(6116002)(6306002)(6512007)(54896002)(5660300001)(93886005)(83716003)(316002)(33656002)(2900100001)(102836004)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(486006)(256004)(7736002)(8676002)(4326008)(97736004)(25786009)(53936002)(11346002)(476003)(66066001)(2616005)(446003)(478600001)(14454004)(5250100002)(86362001)(106356001)(6916009)(229853002)(6506007)(68736007)(58126008)(26005)(36756003)(99286004)(6246003)(105586002)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4934; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: esmtY3x9d3P7SKm7hcA1f0LmWRhKGPFnVeHC2co1JVAJ4moW16wJoRgz4CT06lpSVXjiJAuEMswD+ZbHklzEzT7pD/miVA4k5UrZmLFns2eiEcan1AY8tavW+xaOQwk3o0F5ee8oclAxqe/FYXq0yxFQzicIOBESPSnbg/zD9FS1qbGZEVfHzN4urj+tzdik17Kp/Ez0LKDZpYcdxXXgJCmXtN62aj1EqR/KTxZx3kLgRyt4O3B/vgYICwgZJf6oUkpV5Eb6WUrwgvYlXCbdsZfFmD13ncQsfS6sRjZoisKY+3bzdNfZyHxVFeG1Te/1kcTXBCOVP05PHPNQUT46zsTrl5V5AhIMPewRu9k2oNk=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E57B965FF572418AB6003AC150C06894junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a850be66-7acc-4b0b-7fa1-08d5e39d49ac
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jul 2018 00:05:02.6864 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4934
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-06_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=858 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807060271
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/FJdRQmqx60S0Xz1GzNRT9waPa8U>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] netconf-binary-encoding comments
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:05:10 -0000

> Why would the unified API be considered harmful to the Internet if NMDA datastores are also present?
> I see no reason to remove existing APIs just because new ones are added.

nmda-restconf preserves the /data resource from RFC 8040.  My comment is more about the lack of information for when the client chooses to use <running> or <candidate> instead.  Maybe it's obvious, not sure, hence the comment.

> With NMDA, a client has to edit candidate and then use POST /restconf/operations/commit to finish the
> edit, which requires 2 steps (or 6 if locking is used). With unified (RFC 8040) 1 step is needed and no
> locking is required.

True.


Kent // contributor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email