[Netconf] 答复: Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-00

"Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 04 July 2018 04:03 UTC

From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "'Wubo (lana)'" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>, netconf@ietf.org
References: <520ECC8D9CA1724BA1CE492DF898F6A33176A2@DGGEMI526-MBX.china.huawei.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEBE24F@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEBE24F@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:02:58 +0800
Message-ID: <00d101d4134b$e5817ad0$b0847070$@org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D2_01D4138E.F3A4BAD0"
Thread-Index: AdQRqTdVZgjuvQxKTiOHMbgCclej/AAALLewAGdS2zA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/4DYMxJlh9phPPqAVJQJjJyGLyMM>
Subject: [Netconf] 答复: Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-00
Precedence: list

Hi, Qin and Walker:

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-7.15 states the following
contents: “An action MUST NOT be defined within an rpc, another action, or
a notification, i.e., an action node MUST NOT have an rpc, action, or a
notification node as one of its ancestors in the schema tree.  For example,
this means that it is an error if a grouping that contains an action
somewhere in its node hierarchy is used in a notification definition. ”,
but the proposal within this draft requires the combination operations
within one transaction. 
 
How about define one new statement that is parallel with the existing ”
action” statement, but can be defined within an rpc? Doing so can lower the
confusion for the associated procedures.
And if we doing the above thing, we should clarify the following things:
1.       What is the order to handle this new statement within other NC
operations?
2.       Can this new statement coexist with other NC operations besides the
“edit-config” and “edit-data” that proposed within the current draft?
3.       Should provide more examples for the usage of this new statement.

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

Network R&D and Operation Support Department

China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.

发件人: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com] 
发送时间: 2018年7月2日 10:18
收件人: Wubo (lana); netconf@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Netconf] Review of
draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-00

 

Thanks Bo, please see reply line.

发件人: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Wubo (lana)
发送时间: 2018年7月2日 10:10
收件人: netconf@ietf.org
主题: [Netconf] Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inline-action-capability-00

 

Hi,all

I like this proposal and add missing piece in NETCONF 2.0 on how to handle
action operation together with other NC operations. A few quick comments as
follows:


1.How do we identify ifstatenable within <config> as action operation?
<config>
<ifstatenable xc:operation="action">
<enable>true<enable>
</ifstatenable>
</config>




[Qin]: Good catch, I think we should ifstatenable element should be include
within <action>element and use action element to identify action operation
data.


2.How do you prevent action operation from conflicting with other
sub-operation within <edit-config> and <edit-data>?

 

[Qin]:Good point, we should make sure action operation and other operation
to be executed together will not generate unexpected result.


3.I think inline action operation can also be applied to other NC/RC
operations such as <get>,<get-config>,<get-data>?

 

[Qin]: Yes, that’s correct, at this stage, we like to start from
<edit-config> and <edit-data> cases. We will cover other NC/RC operations in
the later version after 

action operation within <edit-config> and <edit-data> operation are well
specified.

 

Best regards.

 

Bo

Re: [Netconf] Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inlin… Qin Wu
[Netconf] Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inline-ac… Wubo (lana)
Re: [Netconf] Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inlin… Qin Wu
[Netconf] 答复: Review of draft-zheng-netconf-inlin… Aijun Wang