Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for set of "tracing" documents

The NETCONF Chairs are extending this adoption poll for another two weeks (to Dec 14) in order to obtain a sufficient number of responses.  The chairs implore WG members to provide a response in this timeframe.

Context:
  - there are currently 6 responses
  - the 118 attendance was around 55
  - thus the total response is ~10%
  - but 4 of the responses are from authors
  - thus the non-author response is ~3%
  - the chairs feel this is inadequate for adoption

Kent (and Mahesh)

> On Oct 23, 2023, at 10:08 AM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> This is start of a two week poll on adopting the following set of documents:
> 
> 	CFG-TRACE		[1] draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing-02
> 	W3C-TRACE		[2] draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03
> 	W3C-HEADERS	[3] draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
> 
> The poll ends November 6 (the day before our 118 session).
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> Links:
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing-02 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
> 
> 
> Kent and Mahesh (as co-chairs)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf