Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for set of "tracing" documents

As co-author of some of these documents, I support adopting them all.
/Jan

> On 23 Oct 2023, at 16:08, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> This is start of a two week poll on adopting the following set of documents:
> 
> 	CFG-TRACE		[1] draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing-02
> 	W3C-TRACE		[2] draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03
> 	W3C-HEADERS	[3] draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
> 
> The poll ends November 6 (the day before our 118 session).
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> Links:
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing-02 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
> 
> 
> Kent and Mahesh (as co-chairs)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf