Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for set of "tracing" documents

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I support the set.
The 3 drafts nicely complement each others, as demonstrated by Jan 
Lindblad's presentation at the last two IETF meetings.

Note: I might be biaised b/c I am a co-author of one of the three.

Regards, Benoit

On 10/23/2023 4:08 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> NETCONF WG,
>
> This is start of a two week poll on adopting the following set of 
> documents:
>
> CFG-TRACE[1] draft-quilbeuf-opsawg-configuration-tracing-02
> W3C-TRACE[2] draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03
> W3C-HEADERS[3] draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
>
> The poll ends November 6 (the day before our 118 session).
>
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not 
> support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the 
> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd 
> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> Links:
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing-02 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [2] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-trace-ctx-extension-03 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quilbeuf-netconf-configuration-tracing>
> [3] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rogaglia-netconf-restconf-trace-ctx-headers-00
>
>
> Kent and Mahesh (as co-chairs)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf