[Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 17 March 2018 17:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E019812025C; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.75.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152130769487.18422.3548667687911461178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:28:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/6guZirNwTlszHmAawI8teUorRgo>
Subject: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:28:15 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-netconf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I read this to allow other working groups to work on models related to their protocols, as long as their protocols are not "network management protocols". Is this the intent? As usual, I do not in general love the idea of standing WGs with open ended charters. But I think I'm an outlier on that point and will not get in the way of approval. Since this recharter removes the more extensive history lesson from the later paragraphs, maybe it's also time to remove the history of the name from the first sentence? That is, just start with "The NETwork CONFiguration Working Group (NETCONF) is responsible..."
- [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on char… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on char… Ben Campbell