Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Sun, 18 March 2018 09:30 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29791272E1; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 02:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irSwOB2sReD3; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07D41200FC; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.27.10.6] (ip-132-232-239-173.texas.us.northamericancoax.com [173.239.232.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w2I9U1Vl023422 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Mar 2018 04:30:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host ip-132-232-239-173.texas.us.northamericancoax.com [173.239.232.132] claimed to be [10.27.10.6]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <2C24904B-08FA-4E33-9D2C-133523C5B4D0@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92107174-5A87-47CC-A128-570B05F2783B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:30:00 +0000
In-Reply-To: <a6ac8029-aa79-c0d7-bbb3-b2f1a060ad03@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <152130769487.18422.3548667687911461178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a6ac8029-aa79-c0d7-bbb3-b2f1a060ad03@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/rRAqVlkHVrJaC4FHDIiuo6o4kdI>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 09:30:11 -0000
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 9:43 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Ben, >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-netconf/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I read this to allow other working groups to work on models related to their >> protocols, as long as their protocols are not "network management protocols". >> Is this the intent? > Yes. >> >> As usual, I do not in general love the idea of standing WGs with open ended >> charters. But I think I'm an outlier on that point and will not get in the way >> of approval. >> >> Since this recharter removes the more extensive history lesson from the later >> paragraphs, maybe it's also time to remove the history of the name from the >> first sentence? That is, just start with "The NETwork CONFiguration Working >> Group (NETCONF) is responsible..." > I have a small preference for keeping it. > Let's discuss some more during our IESG meeting tomorrow, if needed. I’m fine keeping it. I just wanted to make sure it was being kept on purpose rather than by default. Thanks! Ben. > > Regards, B. >> >> >> .
- [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on char… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on char… Ben Campbell