Re: [Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: (with COMMENT)

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ben,
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-netconf-19-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-netconf/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I read this  to allow other working groups to work on models related to their
> protocols, as long as their protocols are not "network management protocols".
> Is this the intent?
Yes.
>
> As usual, I do not in general love the idea of standing WGs with open ended
> charters. But I think I'm an outlier on that point and will not get in the way
> of approval.
>
> Since this recharter removes the more extensive history lesson from the later
> paragraphs, maybe it's also time to remove the history of the name from the
> first sentence? That is, just start with "The NETwork CONFiguration Working
> Group (NETCONF) is responsible..."
I have a small preference for keeping it.
Let's discuss some more during our IESG meeting tomorrow, if needed.

Regards, B.
>
>
> .
>