Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 02 July 2018 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76609130ECA; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQmlHO3nzCcZ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50C0130934; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1521; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1530547668; x=1531757268; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BZvWYEH8Kl3aO10Z+WRf7sjshWaxP/7dalgKX9vOFJo=; b=GWZ6LmBi6CS3/UndD1HKJ6nLS8gmxOGYTiJCMyZWzORtgCzPSzVFSpfn WDsEZLPv9bE2ucYjI6yZgzX6+895Vxyy/JxWTXs2rQsIPJvbIabuIf7pF /+j9nlEPkr6kW29CcoJjat8v2O8OezcLATbrwpzyuQnoKiGxqc3iQVnAn w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CeAQBxTTpb/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUYEiiDeYhjjTwqlx4LhGwCg1U3FQECAQECAQECbSiFNgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECASMVNAoPBAsVAQICAiYCAlcGAQwGAgEBgxyBeAioCoIchFuDcYEugQu?= =?us-ascii?q?JOD+BNoJohGSDF4JVAo0JjD0JjxcGiBKFQ4w1hVKBVyKBUjMaCBsVgySCTI4?= =?us-ascii?q?HPjCRWwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,299,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="4924775"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2018 16:07:46 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.105] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-105.cisco.com [10.63.23.105]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w62G7jJc009269; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:07:45 GMT
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, netconf@ietf.org, ibagdona@gmail.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis@ietf.org
References: <152899335818.26447.7759890925422555917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03ac01d411ef$f7d0cfe0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <50d82291-02de-bca3-5384-bc8a8e9e1cb3@cisco.com> <006001d41215$31eb3ba0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <473a14eb-3f38-b538-e597-94bc000b5dbb@cisco.com> <20180702151852.wzd4uy4tql6amy7u@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <61214966-533b-03a3-a296-95eb14381266@cisco.com> <025001d4121d$61750ec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <db4fe29a-f4bd-1c4f-17c9-9977433e11a0@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:07:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <025001d4121d$61750ec0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/HUpEAKHAYLjf3ZXcBpZk1ctPM2o>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:07:57 -0000


On 02/07/2018 16:57, t.petch wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Wilton" <rwilton@cisco.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:31 PM
>
>> On 02/07/2018 16:18, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>>>> On 02/07/2018 15:58, t.petch wrote:
>>>>> Robert, Juergen
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes; in which case, I suggest adding a line to that effect.
>>>>>
>>>>> NEW s.3 after "... (and their submodules) used only for imports."
>>>>>
>>>>> The assignment of a module to a module-set is at the user's
> discretion.
>>>>> YANG library attaches no semantics as to which module-set a module
> is
>>>>> listed in.
>>>> I don't mind us adding this text, except that I would replace
> "user's" with
>>>> "server's".
>>> Yes, its at the server's discretion and I do not mind to spell this
>>> out. But once we gain more experience and/or create additional
>>> standards, we may in the future be more specific.
>> Agreed.
>>
>>>    Perhaps be specific
>>> that at this point in time, this is entirely the server's choice?
>> Yes, I agree.
>>
>>>     The assignment of a module to a module-set is at the server's
> discretion.
>>>     This revision of the YANG library attaches no semantics as to
> which
>>>     module-set a module is listed in.
>> Works for me.
> And me too
I've updated the github copy.

Tom, thanks for the review comment and suggestion.

Rob


>
> Tom Petch
>
>> Thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>>> /js
> .
>