IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis: one week review of a specific change

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 12 December 2017 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B654712946B; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 05:48:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.953
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.953 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iayqSjfXd04W; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 05:48:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4BA126CC7; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 05:48:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=63068; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513086525; x=1514296125; h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HAg3kGLAf9wYZ9wsTT16IwrANavHWgHaYnyG1/pbgZ8=; b=m6reeHu+5M6Slo4rFyZNcvXI/LkxOxnGav93pDPM2y6HSsFXpoOzvQRt aYocI5+ZzgMI8tZ/dMcZJEWWcoDbr7S5uJL/pcOzPTBDbysVYWSwfgEIr vHuEO6CykwzYGIBeahBY4wCZbe19JWXOghhHIQBTcLrWKNQ6j2ryV1re1 Y=;
X-Files: dfpcfioondggippe.png : 43605
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CIAgC83S9a/xbLJq1cGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJNBYFSdCeEAosVoU+FTRSBfgMHAQIYAQyER08ChUgWAQEBAQEBAQEBayiFJAIEAQEDHksLEAsBAxkBAQEiAgICFQEOATAGDQUBAgEBAooiEKgXgicmikgBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEOCgWDY4NhgWkpgwKDLgEYgR4Eg0mCYwWhdIEjhnkBgQGNK4wSh1WNDoFWiACBOyYHK4FOMhoIGxU6gimDB4FPQDcBiAIsghoBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,395,1508803200"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="852132"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Dec 2017 13:48:43 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBCDmgmf018122; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:48:42 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: NETCONF <netconf@ietf.org>
Cc: "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>
References: <987f0de3-00d3-37f0-c919-4fe4f0f16efc@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1b8fa624-988e-dfc6-22b7-c7e2ad10afe6@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:48:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <987f0de3-00d3-37f0-c919-4fe4f0f16efc@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------08C20E1F790089FBD7DD7FE1"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/HbZFrzijdBX-7xQdErSjAG6FhFc>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis: one week review of a specific change
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:48:50 -0000

Dear all,

v9 is posted.
I'll approve the draft unless someone screams now...

Regards, Benoit
> Dear all,
>
> Here is a major change in draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis, suggested by 
> the Security AD Eric Rescola part of the IESG review, which I would 
> like to validate with the WG. See 
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-08.txt
>
>
> The NETCONF WG was cc'ed for the entire discussion.
> What do you think? I will draw the conclusions by Friday Nov 10th.
>
> Note: If the WG is fine, the next step is to approve this document.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email