Re: [netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6369)

["Per Andersson (perander)" <[e-mail]>]

I think the errata should be verified as well.


--
Per


________________________________________
From: Eric Voit (evoit)
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 16:38
To: Per Andersson (perander); Rob Wilton (rwilton); RFC Errata System; Reshad Rahman (rrahman); Einar Nilsen-Nygaard (einarnn); [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6369)


I have no problem this errata being verified.

> From: Per Andersson, January 12, 2024 9:31 AM
> 
> Hi!
> 
> In Section A.1.1 there is an example where id 22 is used with the URI
> https://example.com/restconf/subscriptions/22 .
> 
> It is confusing to have examples which are conflicting in content. On the
same
> server, these subscriptions would not be possible at the same time.
Probably not
> a requirement for a document, but it makes it simpler to read and
understand.
> 
> Reading the rest of the document it seems that the intention throughout is
to
> append the subscription id to the URI.
> 
> 
> --
> Per
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: netconf <[e-mail]> on behalf of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> <rwilton=[e-mail]>
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 15:16
> To: RFC Errata System; Eric Voit (evoit); Reshad Rahman (rrahman); Einar
Nilsen-
> Nygaard (einarnn); [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [netconf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6369)
> 
> Hi Authors, Netconf WG,
> 
> As I try and get through some of the errata backlog, I would like your
input on this
> one.
> 
> I don't think that the RFC is technically wrong here (since the server can
choose to
> use whatever URI they wish), I think that verifying this errata would
probably be
> most helpful.  Otherwise, I will probably move it to "Hold for Document
Update".
> Any opinions?
> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2020 7:52 PM
> > To: Eric Voit (evoit) <[e-mail]>; Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
> > <[e-mail]>; Einar Nilsen-Nygaard (einarnn)
> > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8650 (6369)
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8650, "Dynamic
> > Subscription to YANG Events and Datastores over RESTCONF".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6369
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Muly Ilan <[e-mail]>
> >
> > Section: A.2.1
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > A.2.1.  "subscription-modified"
> >
> >    A "subscription-modified" encoded in JSON would look like:
> >
> >    {
> >      "ietf-restconf:notification" : {
> >        "eventTime": "2007-09-01T10:00:00Z",
> >        "ietf-subscribed-notifications:subscription-modified": {
> >          "id": 39,
> >          "uri": "https://example.com/restconf/subscriptions/22"
> >          "stream-xpath-filter": "/example-module:foo",
> >          "stream": {
> >             "ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications" : "NETCONF"
> >          }
> >        }
> >      }
> >    }
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > A.2.1.  "subscription-modified"
> >
> >    A "subscription-modified" encoded in JSON would look like:
> >
> >    {
> >      "ietf-restconf:notification" : {
> >        "eventTime": "2007-09-01T10:00:00Z",
> >        "ietf-subscribed-notifications:subscription-modified": {
> >          "id": 39,
> >          "uri": "https://example.com/restconf/subscriptions/39"
> >          "stream-xpath-filter": "/example-module:foo",
> >          "stream": {
> >             "ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications" : "NETCONF"
> >          }
> >        }
> >      }
> >    }
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Change the URI to match the ID.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected.
> > When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change
> > the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC8650 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-15)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Dynamic Subscription to YANG Events and Datastores
over
> > RESTCONF
> > Publication Date    : November 2019
> > Author(s)           : E. Voit, R. Rahman, E. Nilsen-Nygaard, A. Clemm,
A. Bierman
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Network Configuration
> > Area                : Operations and Management
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf