IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00

"Jonathan Hansford" <jonathan@hansfords.net> Mon, 19 December 2016 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@hansfords.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC87129522; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hansfords.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s88LG0D4he87; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server.myfast.site (server.myfast.site [212.113.130.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B3C126B6D; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:09:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hansfords.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dFC+NGluHVhOMVBPb5Ulco2YCZW+MwgiQMvgJtiRh8I=; b=mJLyJNc0vlANT9AN5meIYfVTvE fRk1ivANjfXQfADQZFDUKtebMcg+77LCTe/M+TMzUDj9N3PoFrgO6Z5bYyGTns69OAGvRR3doZA1D jjmrlcMMcsTY1RI29flf7BFcP6WUIO/hcPcvApBwmXpF2qEhPhXuVCyeQLWzS6RKZjHWHXK06Ge66 HRd8RpERa9WsIRmksUTBXNvw8SwT//lbTji+v3QKk/akL6kit4PNgbuzBRV2Lgp3INT+jtjFuh4jP fKz64HOuW3sBKGGMN70Kg2tpZuGLGugAeHFsWe6BfzfceMufg1eW4jlzmToNHlcBOeqlPPMzKAuHH Cv7h2zOw==;
Received: from hansfords.plus.com ([84.92.116.209]:37265 helo=Vanguard) by server.myfast.site with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <jonathan@hansfords.net>) id 1cIt0p-002Nb7-63; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:09:35 +0000
From: Jonathan Hansford <jonathan@hansfords.net>
To: 'Ladislav Lhotka' <lhotka@nic.cz>, 'Andy Bierman' <andy@yumaworks.com>, 'Mehmet Ersue' <mersue@gmail.com>
References: <beb56258-c0ae-f625-a2d4-50f6a4c0bf26@labn.net> <B0E8B70F-56B8-48BF-95E8-83A241DD7A45@nic.cz> <20161205093858.GA97253@elstar.local> <9448A315-D0B4-46E3-8456-C648698B50A0@nic.cz> <20161205120210.GA97559@elstar.local> <CABCOCHQZJvCp2=Ay=nMfZPqwLkKe2OCZAZhTaKVryNEKThitNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyj0qOOJZg2b9UA2q7oAEkdEJaNLUd6n_Dc+CE5=U8N7ifsrw@mail.gmail.com> <F8614A0D-518C-4A05-BB7D-C460CD3D5972@nic.cz> <52c8547e61354c1a9adefc69ff07a4a7@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <CABCOCHToDs98tr3o5Np1vjvKa9uMS_MWKJZHo8GQtNj_1xXEiQ@mail.gmail.com> <004101d25589$a0cd5f20$e2681d60$@gmail.com> <CABCOCHTnCu4uE=da2Z+rOArGBoMXcicsofgLQP8LPLGkR-ho5Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2mvfyr3jd.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <m2mvfyr3jd.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:09:36 -0000
Message-ID: <001001d259cf$3d5a0de0$b80e29a0$@hansfords.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQJvIdnLcbPhtZVe/ZwhlJOAl849fwFrVtQ3AezV2tIA+5xlnwL4zh2sAk77YEwCCFzmZgJIVCHNAgcLeowB7aW4ZgFJbBpLAgSx2bABY2d4S58gwHvQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.myfast.site
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - hansfords.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.myfast.site: authenticated_id: jonathan@hansfords.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.myfast.site: jonathan@hansfords.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/_ZuHSxUo74VBWEXtfkSWpVgdQC0>
Cc: 'NetMod WG Chairs' <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, 'NetConf WG Chairs' <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, 'NetMod WG' <netmod@ietf.org>, 'Netconf' <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:09:39 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav
> Lhotka
> Sent: 14 December 2016 14:25
> To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>; Mehmet Ersue
> <mersue@gmail.com>
> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>; NetConf WG Chairs
> <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>; NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>; Netconf
> <netconf@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-
> revised-datastores-00
> 
:
> As for candidate, it is optional and we all know that it is quite
problematic if
> concurrent access of multiple clients is possible. Therefore, it would IMO
be a
> good riddance.

For someone who is yet to see NETCONF and YANG used in anger, can you
explain why judicious use of candidate and lock is problematic with
concurrent access and why, as a consequence, it should be got rid of? One of
the features of NETCONF that attracted us to it is its support for
transactioning, a feature which it would appear came from previous
experience with JUNOS. Is it current guidance that transactioning should not
be used?

Jonathan

> 
> Lada

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email