Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 19 December 2016 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894DA129A59; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:28:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-ITQ8QOzM8g; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2136129A53; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:28:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE3B7F8; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.205]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 58WbtETeCw4A; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAAC2007A; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rG3Jg9I1IUW3; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7B120079; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id AC0FC3DD5F01; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:28:44 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <20161219132844.GA2177@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Jonathan Hansford <Jonathan@hansfords.net>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetConf WG Chairs <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <F8614A0D-518C-4A05-BB7D-C460CD3D5972@nic.cz> <52c8547e61354c1a9adefc69ff07a4a7@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <CABCOCHToDs98tr3o5Np1vjvKa9uMS_MWKJZHo8GQtNj_1xXEiQ@mail.gmail.com> <004101d25589$a0cd5f20$e2681d60$@gmail.com> <CABCOCHTnCu4uE=da2Z+rOArGBoMXcicsofgLQP8LPLGkR-ho5Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2mvfyr3jd.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <001001d259cf$3d5a0de0$b80e29a0$@hansfords.net> <462EE5E8-2FBD-4946-93B5-81E048AB3BE2@nic.cz> <20161219124853.GB2012@elstar.local> <357D486B-0EB0-45E6-9583-730AF0FBB260@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <357D486B-0EB0-45E6-9583-730AF0FBB260@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/ylzmVYfJmYq_h_fM4QDSss3jg0g>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetConf WG Chairs <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:28:49 -0000

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> 
> > On 19 Dec 2016, at 13:48, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:37:57AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> 
> >> I am not proposing to ban candidate or something but IMO it needn't be part of the base NETCONF (or whatever protocol) spec.
> >> 
> > 
> > Lets recall that candidate is a _capability_. Nobody is required to
> > implement it.
> 
> Yes, this is what I wrote. My point is that this capability could/should be moved out of the NETCONF spec to a separate document. The latter can then be modified without affecting the former. 
>

I believe it does not matter where a capability is defined. You can
even declare the capability dead by writing a document declaring it
dead; this does not require to revise the RFC the capability is
defined in. Since the candidate datastore has been in NETCONF since
day one and it is out there and apparently used, I do not see a strong
reason to move the definition. Those who do not like it simply do not
implement it.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>