Re: [netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-wwlh-netconf-list-pagination

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

Andy,

> As author of the "client-server" work, I support blocking all adoptions until it's done, with the hope that others will take an active role in getting the "client-server" work over the finish line.  
> 
> Here is a concrete call for help:
> draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries> discusses a need for IANA-maintain modules to be defined a certain way.
> The "ssh" and "tls" client-server drafts both define IANA-maintained modules, but not exactly this way, and hence need to be updated.  For instance, there is no discussion as to why "identities" were chosen over "enumerations", and there is no XSLT script in the Appendix that can be used to generate the modules.
> I'm happy to work with anyone willing to submit Pull Requests on the GitHub repos for these drafts.
> 
> 
> It sure seems like the goalposts keep moving further and further away.
> Maybe if we delay another 6 months even more new requirements and MISREFs
> can be added to the heap.

How is your statement relevant to what I wrote?  Do you think there is a choice in this matter?  Have you reviewed the modules in question and concluded that there won't be an issue in the handoff to IANA?  Yes, IANA's rebuttal would occur outside the WG, but who's time do you think would be "volunteered" to fix it?  You know, I do not get compensated for this work, right?  What happened to this being a "WG effort"?


> Andy

K.