IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Flow Mobility Draft

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 23 July 2014 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9AE1B2BAD for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqXHwKYflrqh for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE181B2A1E for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=796; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406136635; x=1407346235; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qKv/C7bNx7wv7lI39RI1oWNo3t8rXLXKV9LBjxFeczs=; b=YLP2lULek1ZxeTTaPR2qHaTb07SPAB2XK2SyHDmDfALHtkzyRM35eUih /qgHVt2bJ4v89oZUUsCr9X9UV8vXfDrqu4Gk6660P1N0LOshLVHmsDrJ9 9doa2kGuQRgASkTkXuFnG/G9FCzYh6wasck7IY6d9Qeh/bj0InBlT5R5b Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FALPwz1OtJV2S/2dsb2JhbABZgw6BLc8qAYELFnaEBAIEOj8SAQg2QiUCBA6IR8BCF49LB4RGAQSbLZRAg0iCMQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,718,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="342091694"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2014 17:30:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6NHUXYF019929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:30:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.216]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:30:33 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Flow Mobility Draft
Thread-Index: AQHPppvNA2n8r6ZKjUK+WtNeZdtb0A==
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:30:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CFF53D90.14FE0B%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfvdzuh7E7f-s=JfdhXnDMfLU9=V3+rtNFeSq=A9Za09w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.144.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E363F1754401A24CBF4236F4D941A5E1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/-7xedZMhQO7V_LWmqmff1FBYcl0
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Flow Mobility Draft
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:31:05 -0000

Behcet,


>
>I already did. You can check in the archive. I asked many questions
>and received no replies.
>
>I read Rev. 10 sentence by sentence. I don't think anybody else did
>this in the WG.
>I can claim that I know flow mobility and I can show my credentials.
>
>My assessment was that the only way to incorporate my comments is to
>edit Rev. 10 completely and that's what I did.


Its not about your credentials. I don't understand your approach of
editing a WG document.
 
Chairs can comment, but as a WG member I'm not comfortable  with you or
any one else editing the document and posting the same with out WG review;
Why do we have a Editor then ? Editor may choose to accept all your
changes, that's at his discretion.  Please talk to Carlos.


Regards
Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email