Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03

Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com> Fri, 19 August 2011 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rkoodli@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57F621F884C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NLW1p0Ihqyqe for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3CE21F8B13 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rkoodli@cisco.com; l=2738; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1313771460; x=1314981060; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxiYk5lT/tlquZT5p7YIxZGSvpfE49sfEefnNWeXtP4=; b=eDXrXPyaaS5Y9NuY6Xu0Xuk2bw32kmXX8IgX18jHFt0YYrh5qJ9hR6+C OMj4B8d5ZRNvZlJpxp/debxSJVT73rMF+QcfY7C4JPFBCV4EnWrE8sQJt tURZxNOMtXqZEzxzRFzFfI5lzNT7slcoSYw7FvlHnzlkwuSlUD5LJK6wo g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAFyPTk6tJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABCqA13gUABAQEBAgEBAQEPASkBMRANAQg/Lh8RAQEEARIJGYdPBJopAZ5xhkgEhzEvizOFFYwA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,251,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="14737495"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2011 16:30:57 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com [72.163.63.8]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7JGUv0i012036; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-111.cisco.com ([72.163.62.153]) by xbh-rcd-301.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:30:57 -0500
Received: from 10.21.65.170 ([10.21.65.170]) by XMB-RCD-111.cisco.com ([72.163.62.153]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:56 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:41:24 -0700
From: Rajeev Koodli <rkoodli@cisco.com>
To: <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>, <sarikaya@ieee.org>, <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>, <netext@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CA73E044.133D4%rkoodli@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
Thread-Index: Acxegy+N7YRqnGdqTuKvwzsOtCNkqwABY7kQAAGFqNA=
In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2642AC0AAE@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Aug 2011 16:30:57.0265 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F81E610:01CC5E8D]
Subject: Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:03 -0000

<Chair hat off>

My understanding is that the topic will be discussed after we have a WG
document (which is long overdue).

Raj: please clarify otherwise.

Thanks.

-Rajeev



On 8/19/11 9:07 AM, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
wrote:

> Hi Behcet,
> You may have missed the mail exchange between Julien, Stefano and Raj
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02123.html where upon
> chairs initiated the new proposal as described in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02130.html.
> Personally I would also have liked to include text in the draft which
> recommends proper measures in case of LMA/HA initiated flow switching on
> required re-assurance between LMA and current MAG that MN ist still able to
> access the new MAG instead of removing it completely ...
> 
> Fact is that a majority voted for adoption of the draft with LMA text before
> Aug. 12 ...
> 
> Best regards
> Dirk
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von
> Behcet Sarikaya
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. August 2011 17:18
> An: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com; netext@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt
> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> The consensus call on whether to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6
>> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility,
>> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 has now been completed.
>> Please see
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02068.html for
>> the details of the consensus call itself.
>> 
>> Conclusion is as follows:
>> 
>> There is strong consensus to adopt the I-D as the starting point of
>> the work in the working group with the condition that the LMA
>> initiated flow switching feature be removed from the text prior to it
>> being posted as the WG doc.
> 
> 
> Remove LMA initiated flow switching?
> 
> What are you talking about?
> 
> It is 95% of the draft. The design team agreed to make it LMA initiated.
> 
> 
> 
> I could not see the consensus on this technical issue from the mail, how did
> it come about?
> 
> Talk to Yokota-san, he is going to tell you why LMA/HA initiated flow
> switching is feasible and should be done.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext