Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03

<Chair hat off>

My understanding is that the topic will be discussed after we have a WG
document (which is long overdue).

Raj: please clarify otherwise.

Thanks.

-Rajeev

On 8/19/11 9:07 AM, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
wrote:

> Hi Behcet,
> You may have missed the mail exchange between Julien, Stefano and Raj
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02123.html where upon
> chairs initiated the new proposal as described in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02130.html.
> Personally I would also have liked to include text in the draft which
> recommends proper measures in case of LMA/HA initiated flow switching on
> required re-assurance between LMA and current MAG that MN ist still able to
> access the new MAG instead of removing it completely ...
> 
> Fact is that a majority voted for adoption of the draft with LMA text before
> Aug. 12 ...
> 
> Best regards
> Dirk
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von
> Behcet Sarikaya
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. August 2011 17:18
> An: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com; netext@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt
> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> The consensus call on whether to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6
>> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility,
>> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 has now been completed.
>> Please see
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02068.html for
>> the details of the consensus call itself.
>> 
>> Conclusion is as follows:
>> 
>> There is strong consensus to adopt the I-D as the starting point of
>> the work in the working group with the condition that the LMA
>> initiated flow switching feature be removed from the text prior to it
>> being posted as the WG doc.
> 
> 
> Remove LMA initiated flow switching?
> 
> What are you talking about?
> 
> It is 95% of the draft. The design team agreed to make it LMA initiated.
> 
> 
> 
> I could not see the consensus on this technical issue from the mail, how did
> it come about?
> 
> Talk to Yokota-san, he is going to tell you why LMA/HA initiated flow
> switching is feasible and should be done.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext