Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 16 March 2011 00:15 UTC
Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2674F3A6EAA for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id weBEIyNrT-lI for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD773A6A4E for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sgundave@cisco.com; l=4802; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1300234640; x=1301444240; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WJlTqaJuYQG59ZMIqV2NibSdMVFjGWnKsYzJizmDRzk=; b=aTaYZG6ZvwJX+SAJc4FeQBkCAB4c2n0E2BKyikuA2uhRjNSAg3lwVkPo ywfuNNgeoa152vtLnrozZYLAGSSueoJOJT6/+Ii9QUk54M7Qzu51RepyL orkXk1h8mGQ7+9ZMqL00xBZgPgolYdd75HyIqUp+g5WZW1VvhNNwC1mYP E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAFqef02tJXG8/2dsb2JhbAClOFV3pG6cYYViBIUwhy2DVYMf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,191,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="320712097"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2011 00:17:19 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2G0HGEi019476; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:17:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21b.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.143]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:17:18 -0700
Received: from 10.32.243.120 ([10.32.243.120]) by xmb-sjc-21b.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.143]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:17:17 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:17:15 -0800
From: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C9A54F9B.138B8%sgundave@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
Thread-Index: Acvjb4Cuze2UQTqf2UO9miCVkCpsWQ==
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikxyJvbgV3AfzD0WsTx6GbWaLvtpAYMTrKsq2+2@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2011 00:17:18.0180 (UTC) FILETIME=[8293F240:01CBE36F]
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:15:55 -0000
We have captured this under ND. Its a valid point, that ND is just one sub-case of multicast usage. We should have sub section specific to multicast and we can present this in a generic way. That's fine, we will write up some text for this and resolve it. Sri On 3/15/11 8:15 AM, "Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > We have to deal with the general problem. If there are subcases, let's > deal with all of the subcases, sure. As to link-local, as I said in my > other note multicast traffic isn' t limited to ND thus I don't believe > you have covered them. > > --julien > > 2011/3/14 Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>: >> If you can define the destination scope, link-specific non-link-specific ? >> We have covered link-specific cases in the ND context (which can be >> generalized), non-link specific ? May be if you can reflect the issue that >> you are thinking, that will help resolve the issue. >> >> >> >> Sri >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3/14/11 5:52 PM, "Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The case I have in mind is: IP stack wants to send a packet to >>> multicast address M; How is it transmitted? >>> >>> --julien >>> >>> 2011/3/14 Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>: >>>> Julien: >>>> >>>> Agree. I did put that note below that we should add any additional cases. >>>> The text around handling link-specific multicast traffic with different >>>> destination scopes covers most of the common multicast cases, ALL-NODES, >>>> SOLICTED-NODE... We can add any missing cases and resolve it. Any specific >>>> case you are thinking about ? We can generalize the case and make it apply >>>> for ND and non-ND cases. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Sri >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/14/11 5:25 PM, "Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sri - >>>>> >>>>> Multicast traffic isn' t limited to ND, thus I don' t think it is >>>>> appropriate to consider this issue as closed because you crafter some >>>>> text on ND considerations elsewhere in this document. Please clarify >>>>> how tranmission on multicast traffic is handled over a logical >>>>> interface. >>>>> >>>>> --julien >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic >>>>>> >>>>>> Clarify how the logical >>>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We believe we have resolve this issue, this is captured in the ND >>>>>> interactions section. The general considerations around dealing with >>>>>> link-specific multicast traffic, all-nodes, solicited node multicast >>>>>> traffic, or others have common considerations. It is possible we might be >>>>>> missing few cases, we can add that in, but the base handling of things at >>>>>> the logical interface level, or sub-interface level is captured. Comments >>>>>> welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sri >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/3/11 9:19 AM, "netext issue tracker" >>>>>> <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic >>>>>> >>>>>> Clarify how the logical >>>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->> >> >> >> - >>>>>> >>>>>>> Reporter: basavaraj.patil@Š | Owner: telemaco.melia@Š >>>>>>> >>>>>> Type: defect | Status: new >>>>>>> >>>>>> Priority: critical | Milestone: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Component: logical-interface-support | Version: >>>>>>> >>>>>> Severity: - | Keywords: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->> >> >> >> - >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/5> >>>>>> netext >>>>>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/netext/> >>>>>> >>>>>> _____________________________________________ >>>>>>> __ >>>>>> netext mailing >>>>>>> list >>>>>> netext@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> netext mailing list >>>>>> netext@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
- [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast… netext issue tracker
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Julien Laganier
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Julien Laganier
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… MELIA, TELEMACO (TELEMACO)
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Julien Laganier
- Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multi… Sri Gundavelli