Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic

["MELIA, TELEMACO (TELEMACO)" <[e-mail]>]

Julien, is the question about global multicast traffic?

telemaco 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Sri Gundavelli
Envoyé : mardi 15 mars 2011 04:00
À : Julien Laganier
Cc : [e-mail]
Objet : Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic

If you can define the destination scope, link-specific non-link-specific ?
We have covered link-specific cases in the ND context (which can be generalized), non-link specific ? May be if you can reflect the issue that you are thinking, that will help resolve the issue.



Sri






On 3/14/11 5:52 PM, "Julien Laganier" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> The case I have in mind is: IP stack wants to send a packet to 
> multicast address M;  How is it transmitted?
> 
> --julien
> 
> 2011/3/14 Sri Gundavelli <[e-mail]>:
>> Julien:
>> 
>> Agree. I did put that note below that we should add any additional cases.
>> The text around handling link-specific multicast traffic with 
>> different destination scopes covers most of the common multicast 
>> cases, ALL-NODES, SOLICTED-NODE... We can add any missing cases and 
>> resolve it. Any specific case you are thinking about ? We can 
>> generalize the case and make it apply for ND and non-ND cases.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/14/11 5:25 PM, "Julien Laganier" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Sri -
>>> 
>>> Multicast traffic isn' t limited to ND, thus I don' t think it is 
>>> appropriate to consider this issue as closed because you crafter 
>>> some text on ND considerations elsewhere in this document. Please 
>>> clarify how tranmission on multicast traffic is handled over a 
>>> logical interface.
>>> 
>>> --julien
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Sri Gundavelli <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
>>>> 
>>>>  Clarify how the logical
>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> We believe we have resolve this issue, this is captured in the ND 
>>>> interactions section. The general considerations around dealing 
>>>> with link-specific multicast traffic, all-nodes, solicited node 
>>>> multicast traffic, or others have common considerations. It is 
>>>> possible we might be missing few cases, we can add that in, but the 
>>>> base handling of things at the logical interface level, or 
>>>> sub-interface level is captured. Comments welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sri
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/3/11 9:19 AM, "netext issue tracker" 
>>>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
>>>> 
>>>>  Clarify how the logical
>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>> 
---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->>>>
-
>>>> 
>>>>> Reporter:  basavaraj.patil@Š          |       Owner:  
>>>>> telemaco.melia@Š
>>>>> 
>>>>     Type:  defect                     |      Status:  new
>>>>> 
>>>>  Priority:  critical                   |   Milestone:
>>>>> 
>>>> Component:  logical-interface-support  |     Version:
>>>>> 
>>>>  Severity:  -                          |    Keywords:
>>>>> 
>>>> 
---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->>>>
-
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/5>
>>>> netext
>>>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/netext/>
>>>> 
>>>> _____________________________________________
>>>>> __
>>>> netext mailing
>>>>> list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netext mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext