Re: [netext] #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic

[Julien Laganier <[e-mail]>]

We have to deal with the general problem. If there are subcases, let's
deal with all of the subcases, sure. As to link-local, as I said in my
other note multicast traffic isn' t limited to ND thus I don't believe
you have covered them.

--julien

2011/3/14 Sri Gundavelli <[e-mail]>:
> If you can define the destination scope, link-specific non-link-specific ?
> We have covered link-specific cases in the ND context (which can be
> generalized), non-link specific ? May be if you can reflect the issue that
> you are thinking, that will help resolve the issue.
>
>
>
> Sri
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/14/11 5:52 PM, "Julien Laganier" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> The case I have in mind is: IP stack wants to send a packet to
>> multicast address M;  How is it transmitted?
>>
>> --julien
>>
>> 2011/3/14 Sri Gundavelli <[e-mail]>:
>>> Julien:
>>>
>>> Agree. I did put that note below that we should add any additional cases.
>>> The text around handling link-specific multicast traffic with different
>>> destination scopes covers most of the common multicast cases, ALL-NODES,
>>> SOLICTED-NODE... We can add any missing cases and resolve it. Any specific
>>> case you are thinking about ? We can generalize the case and make it apply
>>> for ND and non-ND cases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/14/11 5:25 PM, "Julien Laganier" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sri -
>>>>
>>>> Multicast traffic isn' t limited to ND, thus I don' t think it is
>>>> appropriate to consider this issue as closed because you crafter some
>>>> text on ND considerations elsewhere in this document. Please clarify
>>>> how tranmission on multicast traffic is handled over a logical
>>>> interface.
>>>>
>>>> --julien
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Sri Gundavelli <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
>>>>>
>>>>>  Clarify how the logical
>>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We believe we have resolve this issue, this is captured in the ND
>>>>> interactions section. The general considerations around dealing with
>>>>> link-specific multicast traffic, all-nodes, solicited node multicast
>>>>> traffic, or others have common considerations. It is possible we might be
>>>>> missing few cases, we can add that in, but the base handling of things at
>>>>> the logical interface level, or sub-interface level is captured. Comments
>>>>> welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/3/11 9:19 AM, "netext issue tracker" <[e-mail]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> #5: Logical interface support: Multicast traffic
>>>>>
>>>>>  Clarify how the logical
>>>>>> interface deals with multicast traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->>>>
> -
>>>>>
>>>>>> Reporter:  basavaraj.patil@Š          |       Owner:  telemaco.melia@Š
>>>>>>
>>>>>     Type:  defect                     |      Status:  new
>>>>>>
>>>>>  Priority:  critical                   |   Milestone:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Component:  logical-interface-support  |     Version:
>>>>>>
>>>>>  Severity:  -                          |    Keywords:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------+----------------------------------->>>>
> -
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/5>
>>>>> netext
>>>>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/netext/>
>>>>>
>>>>> _____________________________________________
>>>>>> __
>>>>> netext mailing
>>>>>> list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> netext mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>