Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3AF21E80CB for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.242
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.243, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id moPdROA5obmX for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22f.google.com (mail-ea0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E0011E810C for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z7so4411694eaf.6 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=YKGLGX3id7ax5cBbCVGkVROiRu3ShaEpN55MPuu+eYk=; b=bSddH7xgthgMop8BR5tigggkAzSHtGeQJtgGLGJ/rqVUQRgBhxeUQ0igE51yEuJHW0 KKdxDov6lC7h9lfQBdNVCPy4GMIuvIxbbx0czt1KKIy3SGoVwsFzL/xG8waGjJElDdKh Qtq8HzGOySkJZIas18oQ0Etg+omv2+vzHcAzUojUcPXITQeqcn18Bec7BPm18+CluJ/a EvoGb8apoadGuYxnYc9oxmgNAwJVSu4YLPjAtgVmuR9oDZ7DTMYWp1MHXyJFbqPt+3hU E3b5b8i/0zPdCzGAfo/BIa20rbvl7zUVPmuh6jBDTEjYU7Ub4qZm1Mz5JBxlyIPugEgc k8/g==
X-Received: by 10.14.173.70 with SMTP id u46mr11333301eel.92.1371803977383; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.117.15.109] ([188.117.15.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e44sm6045040eeh.11.2013.06.21.01.39.35 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C30764.1010709@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:39:35 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80BDC091-5C17-4299-B310-298093A21E6F@gmail.com>
References: <20130618165433.13710.84861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51C30764.1010709@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:39:39 -0000

On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> The functionality offered to the Mobile Router, as described in this
> draft, is similar if not the same as what the 64share draft does
> draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 behaviour called 'IPv6 tethering' and
> witnessed on smartphones on cellular operators.

Obviously we are and were aware of this all the time..

> A deployer of Mobile Routers faces thus two alternatives: should use
> 64share exclusively on the smartphone?  Or should deploy PMIP-PD in the
> infrastructure?  It's pointless to do both.

You are missing one thing here. What NETEXT is doing is specific to
PMIPv6 and fixes/clarifies a specific issue related to prefix delegation.

> 
> Remark also that 64share v6ops discussion seems to have an oppinion with
> respect to DHCPv6-PD (it is the right thing to do), yet no oppinion
> about PMIP-PD.
> 
> Given these aspects, I am surprised there is no reference from one draft
> to the other.

Because there is no need. The v6ops work is independent of what NETEXT is
doing and what NETEXT is doing cannot prohibit an operator deploying what
v6ops is defining..

- Jouni

> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 18/06/2013 18:54, internet-drafts@ietf.org a écrit :
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility
>> Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> Title           : Prefix Delegation Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6
>> Author(s)       : Xingyue Zhou Jouni Korhonen Carl Williams Sri
>> Gundavelli Carlos J. Bernardos Filename        :
>> draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09.txt Pages           : 27 Date
>> : 2013-06-18
>> 
>> Abstract: This specification defines extensions to Proxy Mobile IPv6
>> protocol for allowing a mobile router in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain
>> to obtain delegated IP prefixes for its attached mobile networks.
>> The mobility entities in the network will provide network-based
>> mobility management support for those delegated IP prefixes just as
>> how IP mobility support is provided for the mobile node's home
>> address. Even as the mobile router performs a handoff and changes its
>> network point of attachment, mobility support is ensured for all the
>> delegated IP prefixes and for all the IP nodes in the mobile network
>> that use IP address configuration from those delegated IP prefixes.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-09
>> 
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext