[Netext] LMA redirection (was RE: WG Review: Network-Based Mobility Extensions (netext))

[vijay at wichorus.com (Vijay Devarapalli)]

Hi Sri, 

> Ok. How can we prove it either way. Lets hear from the
> WG, if how many other folks have concerns keeping it on
> standards track.
> 
> Either way, as I was told the planned charter evolved
> based on the BOF WG feedback.

There was less than 5 minutes for this presentation. I couldn't even go
to the mike and saying something. But I had already given feedback on
this to the authors, to the chairs and to you offline before and during
the IETF meeting. 

Before the BoF, there hasn't been any discussion on this on the mailing
list. 

I was actually surprised to see this on the charter.

> >> and we need a ratified well thought out
> >> solution and not with the purpose of gathering more practical
> >> data via experimental track.
> >
> > An experimental RFC does not mean it is intended for 
> testbeds and such.
> > It just means we are not sure if this is *the* solution.
> >
> 
> But, I'm sure we need this :), just as you are not sure.

FWIW, there a lot of vendors who already do this kind of load balancing
across blades in a chassis without modifying the protocol exchanges.
What more proof do you need?

Vijay

> 
> Lets hear from the WG ...
> 
> Thanks
> Sri
> 
>