Re: [netlmm] About the Agenda for the meeting - your input is needed

[Frank Xia <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jonne

I am following the practice in  MEXT in which RADIUS draft  is included
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mext/draft-ietf-mip6-radius/.

IMO, it makes sense. 

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Soininen Jonne (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <[e-mail]>
To: "ext Frank Xia" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [netlmm] About the Agenda for the meeting - your input is needed


> Frank,
> 
> I thought radius extensions would rather be at radext WG than in netlmm. 
> This would then be in line with dime and the diameter work as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jonne.
> ext Frank Xia wrote:
> > Hi Soininen
> >
> > I think  that "RADIUS Proxy Mobile IPv6" is another topic to consider for
> > rechartering.
> > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/draft-xia-netlmm-radius-02.txt
> >
> > It is necessary mechanism when deploying PMIPv6 using RADIUS as AAA protocol.
> >
> > In fact, the corresponding document, Diamter Proxy Mobile IPv6, is also  being 
> > discussed  as a rechartering item in DIME WG.
> > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6-03.txt.
> >
> > BR
> > Frank
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <[e-mail]>
> > To: <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:34 PM
> > Subject: [netlmm] About the Agenda for the meeting - your input is needed
> >
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > I didn't have the possibility before today to combine the agenda, though I
> > kind of knew what to expect. I think we have a problem for which I would
> > like to ask for your help.
> >
> > First of all the proposed skeleton is the following:
> >
> > Network-based Local Mobility Management (NetLMM)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > TUESDAY, March 11, 2008
> > 0900-1130 Morning Session I
> >
> > Chairs: 
> > Jonne Soininen <[e-mail]>
> > Vidya Narayanan <[e-mail]>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > PRELIMINARIES
> > Agenda review
> > Blue sheets
> > Notes and Jabber scribe
> > WG status
> >
> > WG DRAFT DISCUSSIONS
> >
> > Topic: Proxy Mobile IPv6
> > Draft: draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
> >
> > Topic: IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6
> > Draft: draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support-02.txt
> >
> > Topic: Interface between a Proxy MIPv6 Mobility Access Gateway and a Mobile
> > Node
> > Draft: draft-ietf-netlmm-mn-ar-if-03
> >
> > POSSIBLE NEW WORK ITEMS
> >
> > Presentations of the possible new work items
> >
> > RECHARTERING DISCUSSIONS
> >
> > NEXT STEPS and WRAP UP
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > So we have basically 2.5 hours to spend, and we _have to_ discuss the
> > current WG drafts, and get to understand what are we doing going forward.
> > The emphasis of the work has to be on these two things.
> >
> > I have listed the following requests for presentations (the order is not
> > important):
> >
> > -Multiple Interface Support with PMIPv6 (15 Min) - Vijay
> >  (draft-devarapalli-netlmm-multihoming-02.txt)
> >
> > -PMIPv6 Heartbeat Mechanism (10 Min) - Vijay
> >  (draft-devarapalli-netlmm-pmipv6-heartbeat-01.txt)
> >
> > -PMIPv6 and MIPv4 interactions (10 min) - Vijay
> >
> > -Multihoming Scenarios (10 min) - Ahmad
> >
> > -GRE keying (5 min) - Ahmad
> >
> > -Route Optimization (10 min) - Christian
> >
> > -Inter-MAG Route Optimization (10 min) Ashutosh
> >
> > -Inter-technology handover extensions (10 min) - Marco
> >
> > -PMIPv6 support Transient CoA Registration (10 min) - Ahmad
> >  draft-muhanna-netlmm-pmipv6-support-transient-coa-00.txt
> >
> > -Proxy Network Mobility (10 Min) - John
> >
> > -Secondary Binding Cache Entries for PMIP (10 min) - Oliver
> >  draft-blume-netlmm-secondary-bce-proxymip6ho-00.txt
> >
> > -Multiple interface support (10 min) - Mohana
> >  draft-jeyatharan-netlmm-multi-interface-ps-01.txt
> >
> > -Proxy Mobile IPv6 indication and discovery (10 min) - Basavaraj
> > draft-damic-netlmm-pmip6-ind-discover-03.txt
> >
> > And I'm pretty sure I forgot something (please remind me if I did).
> >
> > The problem is that this does not really fit. We cannot have all of these
> > presentations and accomplish our main goal of the meeting. So, I think we
> > have to compress and rethink the presentations.
> >
> > However, I see some patterns/groups (again the order is not of importance):
> >
> > Interaction
> >  -PMIP6-MIP4
> >  -PMIP6-MIP6 (presented in earlier meeting)
> >
> > Multiple interface support/Multihoming
> >  -Vijay
> >  -Mohana
> >  -Ahmad
> >  -Marco?
> >
> > Route Optimization
> >  -Christian
> >  -Ashutosh
> >
> > Multiple COA Registration
> >  -Ahmad
> >  -Oliver
> >
> > Others
> >  -GRE keying (Ahmad)
> >  -Heart Beat (Vijay)
> >  -PMIP indication and discovery (Basavaraj)
> >
> > Could we do some grouping here or cooperation to get the different problems
> > areas at least presented? In addition, I would think it would be good to get
> > the items presented that it seems our "customers" like 3GPP, 3GPP2, and
> > Wimax Forum expect us to get done. I think this is extremely important input
> > for the rechartering discussion.
> >
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jonne.
> >
> > PS. I think we will let only the people enter the meeting room who have
> > commented/reviewed the remaining WG items we have in the current charter...
> > ;)
> >
> > PS/2: Any volunteers for Jabber scribes and minute takers?
> >
> >   
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm