Re: [netlmm] NETLMM Re-Chartering Topics

Hi Vidya,
  As I mentioned, multiple prefixes (instead of one) support that was added to PMIPv6 starting with draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-13 on May 12, 2008 requires us to look into prefix management at the LMA. There is a draft which has received comments. So my proposal fits well into your request of a work item for the next 12 months or so.

Regards,

Behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2008 7:08:49 PM
Subject: RE: [netlmm] NETLMM Re-Chartering Topics - Seeking Input

Hi Behcet,
Was this proposed earlier and did we miss it, or is this a new proposal?

Vidya 

________________________________

    From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com] 
    Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:33 AM
    To: Narayanan, Vidya
    Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
    Subject: Re: [netlmm] NETLMM Re-Chartering Topics - Seeking
Input

    Hi Vidya,
      PMIPv6 latest versions are requiring multiple prefixes to be
assigned to MNs. I think this makes prefix management at LMA a strong
requirement. So our proposal is
    o Prefix Delegation Support for PMIPv6
    The work could be based on newer versions of the draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix-delegation-01
    [E] Willing to serve as editor of the chosen draft or
    [C] Willing to co-author or contribute reasonably good amount of
text
    corresponding to the work item
    for me, I solicit others to contribute as [E] or [C].
      This work can be concluded within 12 months easily.

    Regards,

    Behcet

    ----- Original Message ----
    From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
    To: netlmm@ietf.org
    Sent: Friday, June 6, 2008 11:09:11 AM
    Subject: [netlmm] NETLMM Re-Chartering Topics - Seeking Input

    All,
    Jonne and I are working on the rechartering process.  There is
    sufficient consensus from the last meeting and subsequently on
the
    mailing list on the following topics: 

    1) Mobile IPv6 and PMIPv6 interactions
    2) GRE keying option to support separation of different flows in
one
    PMIPv6 tunnel
    3) AAA support for PMIP (RADIUS and Diameter)
    4) Automated Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) discovery
    5) Management Information Base (MIB) for PMIPv6

    Additionally, there have been a number of topics proposed on the
mailing
    list.  As we said at the last meeting, we are trying to scope
the
    charter for the next 12 months or so.  The above items are
likely to
    take that level of resources from the working group.  We can
probably
    take one more item on the list as a task for the WG.  However,
there is
    no clear consensus on what that item might be.  This is an
attempt to
    get input from the working group on the relative priorities and
expected
    participation on the various topics proposed so far.  

    A collection of the work items proposed have been included
below.
    Please respond to this email with your prioritized list of
items.
    Please also indicate what level of participation you will
provide for
    each item that you choose, along the following lines: 

    [E] Willing to serve as editor of the chosen draft

    [C] Willing to co-author or contribute reasonably good amount of
text
    corresponding to the work item

    [R] Review the intermediate versions of drafts corresponding to
the work
    item 

    For instance, your response may be of the form: 

    [R] Path Management and Failure Detection for PMIPv6 
    [ECR] Inter-MAG handover optimization

    Here is the list of the remaining proposed work items, in no
particular
    order of priority: 

    o  Inter-MAG handover optimization: Handling packets in flight
upon
    abrupt tunnel switch; inter-MAG tunnels, etc. [Note: This
particular
    work item may be handled by MIPSHOP eventually; however, please
include
    this in prioritization and indicate your interest in
contribution]

    o  Path Management and Failure Detection for PMIPv6: Heartbeats
to
    detect in-path failures

    o  NEMO Support for PMIPv6: Supporting mobile routers and
networks with
    PMIPv6 

    o  Route Optimization for PMIPv6: Improving latency by
intra-MAG,
    inter-MAG and/or inter-LMA route optimization solutions

    o  Advanced multihoming: Supporting various multihoming
scenarios,
    including a single prefix across interfaces model

    o  Interaccess handover support: Solutions for handoffs across
    interfaces involving different access networks 

    o  Shared link support: Supporting the shared link model in
PMIPv6

    Please provide this input by June 16th, 2008. 

    Thanks,
    Vidya and Jonne 
    _______________________________________________
    netlmm mailing list
    netlmm@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

Re: [netlmm] NETLMM Re-Chartering Topics - Seeking Input