Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings

["Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lou,

[As an individual contributor to the DT]

I believe the key aim here is to have a convenient handle to email the set of folks actively editing these documents.

Using the -authors aliases might be somewhat awkward given that not everyone who is currently actively working in the design team is listed as an author on all documents and some discussions still transverse multiple drafts.

Please can I check - would you also be opposed to having a closed/private alias with just the document authors on? [This could expand to the full set of draft-authors aliases.]

Or is your point that all email discussion on topics that span more than one WG document should really be on the WG alias anyway?

Thanks,
Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger <[e-mail]>
> Sent: 15 April 2020 16:50
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>; Kent Watsen
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings
> 
> Rob,
> 
>      I have negative experiences with open side lists for specific WG
> topics -- basically the  list becomes so large that discussions that
> should take place on the WG list happen on the side list and end up
> including only those "in the know" -- in short I do object to having an
> open (to subscription) side mail list.
> 
> At this point I suggest using the standard document list expansions for
> authors discussions.  Wider discussions can be on the WG list.  We can
> also leave the DT untouched so that the archive remains and give folks
> time to transition to the new mode of working.
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 4/15/2020 5:04 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> >
> > I’ve also checked with Warren.  I had queried whether it would be okay
> > to create a separate alias for the authors.  He has no concerns but
> > also suggested just opening up the existing netmod-ver-dt (the
> > archives have always been public).
> >
> > Do the chairs have any objections to keeping the netmod-ver-dt alias,
> > making it open, and cleaning up the description to remove the design
> > team references?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> >
> > *From:*Netmod-ver-dt <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of
> > *Kent Watsen
> > *Sent:* 10 April 2020 03:16
> > *To:* Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <[e-mail]>
> > *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > *Subject:* Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings
> >
> > I think that it’s up to the authors now, but I have no issues with
> > scheduling a WebEx for you, if that’s what you’d like…is it?
> >
> > Separately, Rob was asking before about keeping the “netmod-ver-dt”
> > alias, which I also have no issue with.
> >
> > Co-chairs agree?
> >
> > K.
> >
> >
> >
> >     On Apr 9, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
> >     <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi chairs,
> >
> >     Now that VERDT is over, will you be scheduling a regular meeting
> >     (inviting the WG) or is that up to the authors?
> >
> >     Regards,
> >
> >     Reshad.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netmod-ver-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt