Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to the NETMOD WG

["Jan Medved (jmedved)" <[e-mail]>]

Sorry for the late response, Ive been really underwaterŠ FWIW, please find
below my input: 

1. Support
2. Support
3. Support, being implemented in OpenDaylight
4. Support
5. Support, being implemented in OpenDaylight,
6. Support, being implemented in OpenDaylight
   - Martin: agreed, the draft needs more work, but it's an implementable
             starting point
   - Andy: agreed, but we need access to device models through the
           controller too


Thanks,
Jan


On 12/3/13 8:31 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>here is my quick summary of the result of the poll. In total, I saw
>input from six people and here is a dense summary of what I think they
>said. Let me know if something is missing or widely incorrect.
>
>* Proposed NETMOD work items
>
>  [1] 
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-01.txt
>  [2] 
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-xpath-extensions-00.t
>xt
>  [3] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-json-02.txt
>  [4] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-huang-netmod-acl-03.txt
>  [5] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-yang-network-topo-01.txt
>  [6] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-01.txt
>
>* Martin Bjorklund
>
>  [1] real problem, not sure the I-D has the proper solution
>  [2] support (obviously) and implementation of this
>  [3] support and willing to review
>  [4] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [5] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [6] interesting issue but the solution may be too simplistic/specific
>
>* Andy Biermann
>
>  [1] support (obviously)
>  [2] support as a YANG extension but not as a new YANG version
>  [3] support and required if RESTCONF gets chartered in NETCONF
>  [4] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [5] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [6] network-wide data models is different than the NFS mount type
>solution
>
>  Andy likes to avoid another version of the YANG language at this
>  point in time.
>
>* Ladislav Lhotka
>
>  [1] support but should be part of YANG 1.1
>  [2] support but should be part of YANG 1.1
>  [3] support but should be part of YANG 1.1
>  [4] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [5] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>  [6] support of the work but not sure NETMOD is the right home
>
>* Reinaldo Penno
>
>  [1] 
>  [2] support but with lower priority
>  [3] support adoption and willing to review
>  [4] support adoption and willing to review
>  [5] asking for a device model to complement this...
>  [6] support adoption
>
>* Xufeng Liu
>
>  [1] support but should be part of YANG 1.1
>  [2] support but should be part of YANG 1.1
>  [3] support and implementing this already
>  [4] support of the work
>  [5] support of the work and started to implement this
>  [6] 
>
>* Alexander Clemm
>
>  [1] support but the solution may need further work
>  [2] support
>  [3] support
>  [4] support (obviously)
>  [5] support (obviously)
>  [6] support (obviously)
>
>  Alex believes YANG is not mainstream enough to have data models been
>  done by other working groups.
>
>/js
>
>-- 
>Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
>Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod