[netmod] FW: poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to the NETMOD WG
"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Fri, 06 December 2013 06:07 UTC
Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017831AE2D5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:07:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0blEjfawown for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DCE1AE2C8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:07:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12159; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386310046; x=1387519646; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1iK9BxdE+8Jim5t1gB4Ipc9xdUEZ057UnHqJ3KzOG5Y=; b=D4CBogdd9q1BWLP3mR7gsoagZ2AcXw6URnu0dMTkZR8d/3RW47ItqDRg NF1EGk7+TdGt4OYf2rPGzRWL3sNMDtSHxtnvsmo3lfgWYkDVZ3fop+IjA HCpgGl77lEAYb9lpPa6Z5g+jzeZur35agnMStOpgWtiHNHWE6/At0hdRX A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMHANZooVKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABWA4JDRDhTsCKIA06BJBZ0gh4HAQEBBAEBASpBFwICAgEIDgIBAwECCx0HGwwLFAcBAQUDAgQBEgiFQQeCMg3BDRcEjksgAQwKAQYLgw+BEwOUMYUTkGODKYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,839,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="289756507"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2013 06:07:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB667NpQ003384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:07:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.57]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 00:07:23 -0600
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to the NETMOD WG
Thread-Index: AQHO8GpRG8ivdgBcrUeu+83UjMrorZpGrscA
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:07:22 +0000
Message-ID: <EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B120110638@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <20131120070012.GA44513@elstar.local> <529E45CA.1070503@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <529E45CA.1070503@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.142.105.132]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B120110638xmbalnx11ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [netmod] FW: poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to the NETMOD WG
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 06:07:33 -0000
Here is my late input... I support the work on [4] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-huang-netmod-acl-03.txt [5] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-yang-network-topo-01.txt [6] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-01.txt Due to relevance to OpenDaylight and SDN. I believe it useful to have a consistent namespace administrable across multiple network elements for certain classes of use cases. Efforts on [1], [2], and [3] appear interesting to me, but I haven't examined them enough to have strong opinions. Eric -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to the NETMOD WG Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:00:12 +0100 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de><mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de><mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> To: <netmod@ietf.org><mailto:netmod@ietf.org> Hi, at the last WG meeting in Vancouver, we did run out of time to discuss what to do with the various individual I-Ds that have been submitted to the NETMOD WG. So I like to poll for opinions on the list in order to get a feeling where we are. In particular, I like to poll for opinions on whether the following I-Ds should be worked on in an IETF working group and how you see the priorities. In particular, it would be nice to know who is willing to actively review documents and also who is planning to implement the technology proposed in the various I-Ds. YANG Infrastructure: [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netmod-yang-conformance-01.txt [2] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-xpath-extensions-00.txt [3] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-json-02.txt Data Models: [4] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-huang-netmod-acl-03.txt [5] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-yang-network-topo-01.txt Other Stuff: [6] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clemm-netmod-mount-01.txt If I am missing an I-D that is mature enough to be included in this list, please let me know. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/><http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted to th… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Alexander Clemm (alex)
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Jan Medved (jmedved)
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Lisa Huang (yihuan)
- Re: [netmod] poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Ladislav Lhotka
- [netmod] FW: poll of interest on I-Ds submitted t… Eric Voit (evoit)