Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

> On 8 Mar 2017, at 20:34, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> 
>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
>> 
> 
> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not. Perhaps we should have text
> saying that tree diagrams are expected to be generated by tools and
> that they are expected to be consistent with the model (and hence they
> need to be updated with every change, hence usage of tools is a damn
> good idea).

Tools typically have options so even with their use the output needn't always be the same (for example, types and leafref pointers may be present or not).

Lada

> 
> [I thought this is obvious but perhaps this is not.]
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67