Re: [netmod] Updated version of NMDA Datastores draft with WG LC comments addressed.

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Rob/Authors/All,

Thank you for putting in the effort to update the draft based on LC
comments received.  Please let the WG know when you think all open
issues are addressed and we will do a 1 or 2 week 2nd LC depending on
timing relative to IETF100

WG,

Please don't wait for the 2nd LC -- review this document and confirm
that your previous comments have been addressed, and let the WG know if
you have comments on the other changes.

Thank you,
Lou

Co-Chair/Shepherd


On 10/20/2017 05:11 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've just posted an updated version of the NMDA datastores draft
> (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-05.txt).  The authors believe that
> this should address all of the issues raised during the WG LC.  The
> issues themselves have been tracked at
> https://github.com/netmod-wg/datastore-dt/issues
> 
> Note, there has been a recent (post WG LC) issue raised by Andy
> concerning the handling of Action statements.  A further update to the
> draft may be required depending on the conclusion of that discussion.
> 
> Please may I thank you for reviewing the draft and providing comments. 
> Please may I also ask that if you raised an issue that you check the
> latest draft/diff to ensure that all of your comments have been
> addressed satisfactorily.
> 
> In addition, I would like to summarize what I perceive are the main
> changes made to the draft since WG LC version (-04) so that those
> particular areas can be reviewed as appropriate:
> 
> 1. There is a new "objectives" section added after the short
> introduction to address Tom's request of a better overview.
> 
> 2. We have introduced the notion of a "configuration transformation" to
> describe the possible changes between running and intended, hence
> allowing inactive config and templating to be used only as examples and
> not in any normative text.
> 
> 3. The conventional datastores sections have been moved to a more
> intuitive order, which is a minor change, but causes a slightly larger
> diff when diffing the -04 and -05 versions.
> 
> 4. The description of <running> and <intended> datastores have both been
> updated, hopefully better explaining the relationship between these
> datastores and <operational>.
> 
> Finally, I'll leave it to the WG Chairs to specify what the appropriate
> next steps are in the WG LC process.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Rob
> 
>