IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> Mon, 21 January 2013 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <phil@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970CE21F87F7 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:50:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwSENR26Xojq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EE221F856D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:50:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUP1x1+SfW63GmlXn2lkjb0dJoIujDi9B@postini.com; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:50:33 PST
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:49:47 -0800
Received: from idle.juniper.net (idleski.juniper.net [172.25.4.26]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id r0LGnk364242; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:49:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phil@juniper.net)
Received: from idle.juniper.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idle.juniper.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0LGmtcC082217; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:49:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from phil@idle.juniper.net)
Message-ID: <201301211649.r0LGmtcC082217@idle.juniper.net>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130121.083625.409305784.mbj@tail-f.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:48:55 -0500
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:50:34 -0000

Martin Bjorklund writes:
>The pattern for hex-string .....
>  pattern '[0-9a-fA-F]{2}(:[0-9a-fA-F]{2})*';

Why not support "f:0:4:3:3:1" (single digits)?

Do we canonicalize to upper or lower case?

Thanks,
 Phil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email