Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sun, 20 January 2013 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DEE21F84F2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:40:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TosRuq0WH7YJ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7FE21F84E7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18A20BEA; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:42 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kloqnoTEdHzP; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D131320BE9; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id E19B3240DDFA; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:40:44 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Message-ID: <20130120104044.GA38007@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, David Kessens <david.kessens@nsn.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <20130119011641.GK11206@nsn.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0650AC@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA0650AC@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:40:44 -0000

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:55:29AM +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does this document obsolete RFC6021? The header says nothing about this. 

This is the idea. I have added a sentence to the abstract and the
obsoletes header line.
 
> Is this an official WG document? If so, why is it not named draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021bisp... or something similar? 
> 

I guess we will know after the WG last call whether the WG has
agreement to put the definitions needed by the other WG documents into
this document. But this is really for David to explain if more
explanation is needed.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>