Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)

IF you do a new revision and a new WGLC, then you might as well
rename the document to a wg document name (draft-ietf-netmod...) at
the same time.

Bert
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kessens" <david.kessens@nsn.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Cc: <netmod@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: [netmod] Last Call: draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01 (20130204)

>
> Dan,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:55:29AM +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>
>> Does this document obsolete RFC6021? The header says nothing about this.
>
> for completeness sake: yes
>
>> Is this an official WG document? If so, why is it not named 
>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021bisp... or something similar?
>
> We are jumping the gun a bit here: it is not really about a new document,
> but putting the already agreed upon content it in a new version of another
> already published document.
>
> So yes, the Last Call is about getting it published and making it a wg
> document at the same time. The last was implicit but I should have called
> that out.
>
> Having said this, it seems a new version will be necessary anyways and I
> will be able to correct all this with better wording in a new Last Call of
> a new and improved version.
>
> I hope this helps, and let me know if you have any remaining concerns,
>
> David Kessens
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod 