[netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6991 (5105)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 05 September 2017 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965CD13263F; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMIC_nzSQSTC; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3057D132397; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2CBD8B819C5; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: lhotka@nic.cz, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170905071837.2CBD8B819C5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:18:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/JVR0vfsSuF0I-IcEbjuhEGw6VN0>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6991 (5105)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 07:18:43 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6991, "Common YANG Data Types". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5105

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Date Reported: 2017-09-01
Held by: Benoit Claise (IESG)

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
A schema node of this type will be set to zero (0) on creation
and will thereafter increase monotonically until it reaches
a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal), when it
wraps around and starts increasing again from zero.

Corrected Text
--------------
A leaf instance of this type will be set to zero (0) on creation
and will thereafter increase monotonically until it reaches
a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal), when it
wraps around and starts increasing again from zero.

Notes
-----
In a number of descriptions in both ietf-yang-types and ietf-inet-types, the term "schema node" is used incorrectly in places where "leaf instance" or "instance of a leaf" should be used instead. However, not all occurences of "schema node" are wrong: schema nodes just have to be distinguished from nodes in an instance data tree.

--------------------------------------
RFC6991 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-03)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Common YANG Data Types
Publication Date    : July 2013
Author(s)           : J. Schoenwaelder, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG