Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31F83A1A28; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:06:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=VwJRkfHR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=B4VkGmNF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TwZYlYjIaMqt; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:06:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3576E3A19E0; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:06:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3240; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583219213; x=1584428813; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ULEvDxGdL7yZ8L50ki1iik6AJmMSBs363JdQUpVlPlQ=; b=VwJRkfHRCmOMIWoC9Od2tJiA5eHue4pyZFFzHOIIFQrkuNECHFT7K3uz 7JbwjIh9pk29B/Q5snUtyNh/3JbfWTJig34yz73t3bofcamClZ9z6o4OL wcZODxsh5ZPjZCPUbJh0ue7ezeljzX+NhPaw5YBtokm246fONhojk18Am g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:DDQ58xJtY5tZ3RT+VtmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeBvad2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXFfkLfr2aCoSF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CfBQB5AV5e/49dJa1lHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuBVFAFbFggBAsqCoQKg0YDimaCX5gVgUKBEANUCQEBAQwBASMKAgQBAYRAAheBeCQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFYwEBAQEDEhERDAEBMgUBCwQCAQgOAwQBAQMCJgICAjAVCAgCBA4FCBqDBYJKAy4BAwugagKBOYhidYEyFIJrAQEFhRkYggwJgQ4qjCUagUE/gRFHgk0+glkLAoEwARIBBxyDDzKCLI1egweGFIk+j2gKgjyHUo8wgkl/hyCHAIlJjX8MiWOSTgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSJncXAVO4JsCUcYDY4dg3OFFIVBdAKBJ446AYEPAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,510,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="727444695"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Mar 2020 07:06:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02376pCZ000998 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:06:52 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 01:06:51 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 02:06:50 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 01:06:50 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VsmgFznZmyZQBIpPZlEJAQCY8DktGiP+RNveyafWftY32Q1qrGZeS6SDsKxyIe9q9GHLmV6i0Y8fZl8b7agEMiR2n+RiWxfrI2FJOR2okarXyHUBLE9RDJIRi1MaRFh0MIFhzfiD/VFUf5Ks+8WNXKUxbiD0txVbJ6iBzgId8+gr939klr0Rr05LsBE6OvpwuGWc1Wujl43/KG5mCDHhxhdk9Kai4n+v4OELJQrj7FJi0cVGI9MGFGsQf3786KPCjH+5B8rl/9xiZS/9NnaVcutbBO9p5ZQIyxbCy1fmBqfTpc4N2OuPdWN+BhgXS4g+VciG1x6Vjmh4nIkzyWQP0Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=ULEvDxGdL7yZ8L50ki1iik6AJmMSBs363JdQUpVlPlQ=; b=n0yLa6nIPu1PH+maIXSgYGBu/kI1APd8vBmdgwuiBHGgdwr0S54NVbUmE/cd9TRlCCjNMaOEGaJLYO5d33QMrksoKIDOl0/zdpVOsGJRyiGeK4tQrmGX67uo7/R5uWJe0MQuhxQHBAshxIvWmRmphAuEUzFKKdEEP9OkmcJ0ev72afl7GHQ+Mr03Ie0dvhBFExe5GdfPWbt/56i+fyczqIycWn4aMg7yKCHxXkTgGRD3Yq6qbNSn3Q6mHgBPLUGf134GC0s+miQJxCWfPHTkaZaMMfqyzGN9u7Y434Dl/Dcv92TZieFVHy+Vm/xON/I70RxmOO83X3xn/CM5kQBbQw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ULEvDxGdL7yZ8L50ki1iik6AJmMSBs363JdQUpVlPlQ=; b=B4VkGmNFlEeWm5QI4b424mOIJ9HjFEuTMMedqiYj0Q8RDxEKccXY8mJt5ahkiPx6ms1UQCG4OHcHd0z1gxi21td9gidq6MaQuuJqw5w32K7r41EOMp/voU1GkumBGj1bSg9PLzS+i+BAuUxHWccQGhIzmNSicuGzr0UqCNexU+c=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB3662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ee::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.16; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:06:50 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b9ce:1058:5fa6:44a1]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b9ce:1058:5fa6:44a1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:06:50 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
CC: "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
Thread-Index: AQHV8N/jjQBc+EVHykWjBdc4A8OiGag2ctrA
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 07:06:50 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366A775466779E4C3364D8AB5E40@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <0515e5bd-21fb-f26a-e403-3f8f18b99bf1@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <0515e5bd-21fb-f26a-e403-3f8f18b99bf1@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.15.79.32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0a6aaabd-ea0c-43bb-308d-08d7bf4171f8
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3662:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB36626B7D73188D1036CFCFA3B5E40@MN2PR11MB3662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5236;
x-forefront-prvs: 03319F6FEF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(376002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(9686003)(76116006)(55016002)(7696005)(8676002)(81166006)(66946007)(186003)(81156014)(478600001)(8936002)(6916009)(86362001)(4326008)(53546011)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(6506007)(316002)(2906002)(966005)(26005)(5660300002)(71200400001)(33656002)(52536014)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3662; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: NJkbidp8vL5C4f8UilUaoGJr9J4AlJTo5ieVtlFWl2iMIriZmdV1/j1M/qhzUWTXn5UpWXGCeljJ40DQ9QXEDUxL5EbbKsdybm3mho2CYJrIX/WX2jJk+3j/oy4KH6SltTg+K8ErJmBuvn17E96sgQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0a6aaabd-ea0c-43bb-308d-08d7bf4171f8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Mar 2020 07:06:50.0595 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: H/vXdz1+CZslh6DGCNCVvdOK+XkMZBBQeQtx6vL8komKu+2bHoM9YrVr3ane9P/q9GJS0z5R8s2JW8Nroe1SCQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3662
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KKmGIKmY08hj58KvXpzbXaFGiR0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 07:07:00 -0000

I know of no IPR that applies to this draft.

Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> Sent: 02 March 2020 22:13
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
> Cc: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you
> contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel
> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and would
> like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of
> IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in
> any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
>