Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 13:35 UTC
Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0229E3A0B52; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:35:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OEaJ1dhR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=ZeikPOZu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iSg6hnW1vajO; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:35:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09EDB3A0AE4; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:35:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3474; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583242513; x=1584452113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=LClC3DrPSKbZn9o/DcjKS5C4QI9pzYIiVaCXDugTxVY=; b=OEaJ1dhR/yzwIoHmdkmcvBeSJnERsRsLpNJdM8R+Wrd5HhqdZdSUoFO3 TrAT9kd7I64djLOg/tVHkQDm4EcNFVNJj4r3+4mpa81ZDyBq0DyJ9Gqbp V9uT0R0CsNJCWgNEQntjwaxQIW85eCDJeKQ2zASKf2JQu3FQTVVQyXZ4L 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:ITwVNheNRocWmXQp/Mo+uU04lGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGRD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFnpnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/dTYzHMFLUndu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DjAQByXF5e/4QNJK1lGwEBAQEBAQEFAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBe4FUJCwFbFggBAsqhBSDRgOKZpp0gUKBEANUCQEBAQwBARgLCgIEAQGDe0UCF4FlJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVkAgEDAQEQEREMAQEsBgUBDwIBCA4MAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQUigwQBgkoDLgEOoRoCgTmIYnWBMhSCawEBBYJEglEYggwJgQ4qjCUagUE/gREnIIJNPoJZCwEBgTABEgEHGheCejKCLI1fgweGFIk+j2gKgjyHUo8UHIJJf4cghwCJSY1/DGeIfJAIgkcCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZ3FwFTsqAYJBCUcYDY4dOIM7hRSFQXQCgSePQgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,511,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="727694977"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Mar 2020 13:35:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 023DYxvX032523 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:35:07 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:35:07 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:35:06 -0600
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 07:35:06 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YpTjUJYZnZ1IcX+BUgkbWiypHRbRlVyqCdX9M1cDHaTm/DLDN0OYUz2AnoX+NbxidkVNqYcrWY/f/n5MgBqjw1Vy1JWsBHnKkrcdc8xfocDo+u3AdUGzoK9QaIqb2ATDiN0d+fMlXglsO5W3lVqZ788u/D/+h0J2gXwJziFsda9Xnu/7rX0v4h+2gpIA27gXLsy16tqbngZovNVDe35DnteU9bIyLsaDZz1LaHDWDfKPpmf/KjEo+nI5MezZQTa+ZWjoTGwAE2o7N4qEHYv7iv/Sbcc8JExdoRq48x7seQ4UyiWIM6TsyBOlNs4ShJiV/nuVnBHFtbKvNcMskd7Diw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=LClC3DrPSKbZn9o/DcjKS5C4QI9pzYIiVaCXDugTxVY=; b=lM7z9od0/TyEncplHzgsZQl1Jd170SfswCpoxdqAQ1n77mH3PAJuFS1HrXaMwGopii1JYeYLyVn7mUao2XwKOpNhpvtNU93eyiaMyZpQ+F+OeEDd5sEfB5qqgF/Jx0BlI2fqgvH7qe5HwwGPxdzoKicHaw2B+K14Nxo4ZuXfZCV/LvyUKT1VkvsZqv02WVurcjtmo5XCnYzNVBSk70T+3+Rh2YHDZRwCW9GTTEsFX0YT2uQOI530UBGqIowsPLKIVc2YEZ7bo/TUwWqEWIDy2oTUey5jPEwVQ8DrZBuKJjEONEflDPeH0N6Gkxzc9WogCNmR00KcqibSrz1cjBGu7g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LClC3DrPSKbZn9o/DcjKS5C4QI9pzYIiVaCXDugTxVY=; b=ZeikPOZunuq2iT7FK7zFwVlLe3Gz7tebdYwATh/rY9GHk9a2shfm5HkrgN4CJr2adC3V8sqCHDITS7KnpxH32RWeHhMME304vrn37OBYHBA77HkdCaMapXHuTHcF84w40/vU0TimrszTZ4S17XoxWi8NwqtMwjUSJe+6/Jibzxg=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:69::31) by DM6PR11MB4505.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:1dd::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.18; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:35:05 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d887:b11e:eab5:5476]) by DM6PR11MB3420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d887:b11e:eab5:5476%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:35:05 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
Thread-Index: AQHV8N/sw/QjzdhMK0+VVNQAc0QSUKg2i4eA
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:35:05 +0000
Message-ID: <85F666C8-6FCC-498D-BCC5-3DD5831FEB0B@cisco.com>
References: <0515e5bd-21fb-f26a-e403-3f8f18b99bf1@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <0515e5bd-21fb-f26a-e403-3f8f18b99bf1@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:2840:1250:8db8:371:db62:f944]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4434bb30-a801-4252-2404-08d7bf77af14
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB4505:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB4505DDE3488D9FE64259461BABE40@DM6PR11MB4505.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5236;
x-forefront-prvs: 03319F6FEF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(199004)(189003)(66446008)(64756008)(2616005)(66556008)(66476007)(186003)(478600001)(966005)(110136005)(316002)(86362001)(54906003)(6486002)(6512007)(4326008)(2906002)(8936002)(6636002)(6506007)(33656002)(76116006)(8676002)(66946007)(91956017)(81156014)(5660300002)(81166006)(36756003)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB4505; H:DM6PR11MB3420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Q2o581OBvohRO0b4Ldp6XoJdhNX4a0aIMHwG4Izp46c/8O8wfVFIJkwxvYUT9s4+FPFNJUuJnmvMBSrLbFqEpoHlPd4n7gNlGav/gPcjCQe5pRoze2ikkA/TcMIO9W7m9atMHYkW1IcpTi5JP0g0FiaEfemOVZKnUp+IjeOCPY4uQGWZ3Y8eVMJnAP18shPEegqY/OxBdbpnRJTLNtVMsg==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8DF6B777CD823F44A4522307C2B85931@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4434bb30-a801-4252-2404-08d7bf77af14
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Mar 2020 13:35:05.5240 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: t3METFu21j8hiY3EQPxMsTwo2OxkTOJ4cOlL2ym3f7NfWQiWkp57SaApsfJNZCp909Qx7L0tJGqKp6Jlchsdkw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB4505
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zRdrvLZU0F56Ral8tZPBUNo3odw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 13:35:15 -0000
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. On 2020-03-02, 5:14 PM, "Netmod-ver-dt on behalf of Lou Berger" <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net> wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to acknowledgments after WG adoption). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, NetMod WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. _______________________________________________ Netmod-ver-dt mailing list Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt
- [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-yang… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on dra… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-verdt-netmod-… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on dra… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on dra… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] [Netmod-ver-dt] Regarding IPR on dra… Mahesh Jethanandani