Re: [netmod] [Anima] revising RFC8366 -- Re: BRSKI-AE enum issue -> empty, but what's he encoding ?

["Fries, Steffen" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Michael, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2021 02:37


> I thought I wrote a really nice ASCII art version of what documents inherit from
> RFC8366.  I can't find it in my outbox... I wonder if I nuked the draft by mistake.
> 
> The short of it:
> RFC8366 -> RFC8995 (voucher-request)
>         -> constrained-voucher (voucher-request, voucher)
>         -> brski-async-enroll (voucher-request)
Would it make sense to also state the voucher for BRSKI-AE as it also uses the voucher and tries to argue for a new assertion type (agent-proximity)?

>         -> jose-voucher (voucher, voucher-request)

Regards
Steffen



> 
> and my question was a bit about how we manage all their things inherited.
> It's really the classic CS multiple inheritance problem.
> 
> {A Cat is an Mammal
>  A Cat is an Four-legged creature
>  A Cat is Nocturnal.}