Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

IMO this is an area where running code really matters.

[Qin]: Fully agree, I believe many vendors and proponents have implemented this functionality (I don’t want to name them) and could be a good basis for this model implementation.
Follow similar fashion, we can ask implementation report before this draft gets out of WG.

We should be standardizing the "trailing edge": multiple independent non-standard solutions


exist and the IETF creates a "best-hits" standard.


[Qin]: This is exactly what we are doing in the past, one single draft consolidated from 2~3 independent individual drafts, way back 2~3 years
if we remember the history where this come from.
I have been told recently by some of operators, some other SDO such as ETSI NFV and open source community, they are also looking for such solution and want to use this work as basis for alignment.
Hopefully they will provide input to this work soon.

We should be avoiding Ivory Tower "leading edge" standards where design teams decide how
the world SHOULD work, and there is no running code to back up the theory.