[netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 10 October 2022 08:29 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A24C14CF04; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 01:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhrpGC2RvWEK; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 01:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EC9DC14F744; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 01:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29A8Ta9x022902; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BC84604E; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675F74604B; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-71-56-177.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.56.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29A8TZqA012803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: netmod-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:36 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <005601d8dc82$6f0f4300$4d2dc900$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdjcgiwdxDplZqbsSI+Pdvpmkoqb1Q==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.71.56.177
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27192.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.514-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.514-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27192.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--9.514000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: sp7ydYs5cjoOwAmmWH5kBPrNPkGWAHDfZR+OFNkbtdpcybOKQAEmSMIr JyGzvIdDPKft4OZ+yXi3Ur9R5VHeqKH7Oc3Uu3rAngIgpj8eDcC063Wh9WVqgnXA+T8YcZkDj0t wXbm9D1eh7nN8X6Oixmrz/G/ZSbVq+gtHj7OwNO2+IjsEEOIzYt3GxYItOJOEz8pjJx7GYWbVGX KhevThlwMnleUK6nsw
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Tcs3sxOua_P7eChmMhwIw8h0LGY>
Subject: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:29:47 -0000
Hi, Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is needed." Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the discussion at IETF-114? Thanks, Adrian