Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 11 October 2022 01:07 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1CCC1524D3; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vtCZ-AUSBSd6; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151E8C1524C9; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MmcxB3Sgqz6892k; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:03:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm100008.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.152) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 03:06:43 +0200
Received: from canpemm500005.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.229) by canpemm100008.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:06:41 +0800
Received: from canpemm500005.china.huawei.com ([7.192.104.229]) by canpemm500005.china.huawei.com ([7.192.104.229]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:06:41 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, netmod-chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: netmod <netmod@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags <draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
Thread-Index: AdjcgiwdxDplZqbsSI+Pdvpmkoqb1QAFKZAAAB25n1Y=
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:06:41 +0000
Message-ID: <f805dee8c71c47c89dbce5c649adfbbb@huawei.com>
References: <005601d8dc82$6f0f4300$4d2dc900$@olddog.co.uk>, <bc37ac47-f496-b977-aa79-7be26ffd2130@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <bc37ac47-f496-b977-aa79-7be26ffd2130@labn.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f805dee8c71c47c89dbce5c649adfbbbhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Te-q5OiwYAr5oDcBnTCHemXF3ZY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 01:07:02 -0000
Hi, Lou and Adrian:
We authors plan to issue a new version. We heard some feedback from Balazs and Rob, had some offline discussion with them during last IETF, come up with proposal and questions and brought up on the list on August, Juergen provided his thoughts on these proposal, it looks addition extension is not needed based on Juergen’s feedback. Silence for a while seems to stand for agreement,My feeling is some wording and clarification text is needed, but I love to hear if there are different options.
Chairs, please let us know anything else is needed from us.
________________________________
吴钦 Wu Qin
Mobile：+86-13914734360<tel:+86-13914734360>(Mobile Number)
Email：bill.wu@huawei.com<mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com>
发件人： Lou Berger<lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>
收件人： adrian<adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>;netmod-chairs<netmod-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-chairs@ietf.org>>
抄送： netmod<netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags<draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags@ietf.org>>
主题： Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
时间： 2022-10-11 02:56:33
Adrian,
Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not
addressed in the on-list discussion in August. Do think that they
were? We were at least expecting some document update based on the
discussion.
Authors/Contributors,
Where do you think we stand in resolving the on-list discussion?
Thanks,
Lou (and Kent)
On 10/10/2022 4:29 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last
> email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is
> needed."
>
> Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the
> discussion at IETF-114?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod