Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 10 October 2022 18:55 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33BAC14F739; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKGTfWoeNv9v; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam11lp2168.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.57.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4537C14F6EB; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=labn.net;
Received: from SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:379::24) by PH7PR14MB5298.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:132::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5676.28; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:55:37 +0000
Received: from SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bc3e:efa5:ee99:d62f]) by SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bc3e:efa5:ee99:d62f%7]) with mapi id 15.20.5676.032; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:55:37 +0000
Message-ID: <bc37ac47-f496-b977-aa79-7be26ffd2130@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:55:34 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, netmod-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: netmod@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags@ietf.org
References: <005601d8dc82$6f0f4300$4d2dc900$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <005601d8dc82$6f0f4300$4d2dc900$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR05CA0052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:236::21) To SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:379::24)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SJ0PR14MB4792:EE_|PH7PR14MB5298:EE_
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: aa839c2e-a638-490c-7323-08daaaf104b5
X-OriginatorOrg: labn.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aa839c2e-a638-490c-7323-08daaaf104b5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2022 18:55:37.2311 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: eb60ac54-2184-4344-9b60-40c8b2b72561
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: j3YsXgHW0dEPD4K6asWKHSnRzlbbOmh9lA47guYJ7MelNfDq6pHPvHbAzdtDh3XzTnU1DFw6x1ppjiLDG1uCoA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH7PR14MB5298
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/aMQlCYv-HfH8zarNPn344YuJPiI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 18:55:42 -0000
Adrian, Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not addressed in the on-list discussion in August. Do think that they were? We were at least expecting some document update based on the discussion. Authors/Contributors, Where do you think we stand in resolving the on-list discussion? Thanks, Lou (and Kent) On 10/10/2022 4:29 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi, > > Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last > email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is > needed." > > Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the > discussion at IETF-114? > > Thanks, > Adrian >