Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

Another correction, not all authors responded.  We’re still pending a response from Liang.

Thanks,
Kent


> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Correction.
> 
> Some authors replied:
> 
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”.
> 
> While others replied:
> 
> 	"No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft."
> 
> K.
> 
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Thank you, authors.
>> 
>> All authors responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”.
>> 
>> Kent (as co-chair)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Authors,
>>> 
>>> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on the "yang-node-tags” draft.  In preparation for that, we’ve determined both that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as follows:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>> 
>>> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>>> 
>>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>> 
>>> Please state either:
>>> 
>>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>> or
>>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>> 
>>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>>> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>>> 
>>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>> 
>>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>> or
>>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>> 
>>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>> appropriate.
>>> 
>>> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you
>>> contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel
>>> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
>>> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
>>> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>>> 
>>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>>> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>>> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>>> 
>>> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>> 
>>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>>> and
>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>>> 
>>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>>> response.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod