Re: [netmod] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Kent Watsen <> Wed, 04 September 2019 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1078120BD6; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mj62da4tmCwn; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50A4120BB4; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw;; t=1567623307; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=ijvJ7Exk0TLh2N0gjsjEJqrt4wAnK+df45dnucoK7ZE=; b=Bf1+O20PM5SLvrcGzDuqinKvZIgItt4VteWINVTqKYq+O1Y48S39VWxP+jAQZfQz +3Tw6e1thswGK21EQ2SHr1oEJ33PPl2zySCqa98+YjTVvzFIOhC1rnkSXVF7nxUtOsx vbmOxyqHfeLZ0/kdQi6d2cCwK8NUg4P9IkNskrbw=
From: Kent Watsen <>
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6881309-A6D9-48A4-B94C-633C237E5A56"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:55:07 +0000
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: The IESG <>,, Lou Berger <>, "" <>, "" <>
To: Roman Danyliw <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.09.04-
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 18:55:12 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review.  I'll prepare an update accounting for your (and Adam's) comments shortly. 

First, I have a couple questions:

> (1) Section 1.  To make this document more enduring, Ib
> the capabilities of xml2rfc  (i.e., no line wrapping is done) to a version
> number.

Do you mean, e.g., s/ The `xml2rfc` utility / The `xml2rfc` utility, at least up until the time of this document's publication, / ???

[BTW, I just noticed that `xml2rfc` needs a reference...I'll point it to <>]

> (2) Section 2. Is it worth saying that in addition to the primary target being
> <sourcecode> and <artwork> (xml2rfc tags), it is also anything authors
> currently put between b
> using xml tooling for rendering the draft)?

I think that the word "primarily" already provides the flexibility to use it in other contexts.  That said, I don't know what other `xml2rfc` context exists currently, or do you a future version of the `xml2rfc` specification or, perhaps, a `foo2rfc` specification?  In either case, could you provide a snippet of what you'd like to see?

Thanks again,