[netmod] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 September 2019 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CCC120B5E; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156761980945.22719.16082541805323491673.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 10:56:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Bs_IjDFf5KYC4ph_Od5lgoeOW5A>
Subject: [netmod] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 17:56:56 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Section 1.  To make this document more enduring, I’d recommend qualifying
the capabilities of xml2rfc  (i.e., no line wrapping is done) to a version
number.

(2) Section 2. Is it worth saying that in addition to the primary target being
<sourcecode> and <artwork> (xml2rfc tags), it is also anything authors
currently put between “<CODE BEGINS> … <CODE ENDS>” (sometimes even when not
using xml tooling for rendering the draft)?

(3) Editorial nits:
-- Section 2.  Editorial. s/This work may be also be used/This work may also be
used/.

-- Section 4.2. Editorial.  s/already YANG [RFC7950] modules are extracted/YANG
[RFC7950] modules are already extracted/.