Re: [netmod] Joint WGLC on "semver" and "module-versioning" drafts

WG,

The chairs want to follow up on this Last Call. 

We had some excellent discussion and wanted to ensure that that discussion had time to play out.  We think think that there is still a path forward for "rough consensus" on the these drafts.  To help move the discussion to closure and aid in judging overall WG consensus (beyond just those who have already voiced an opinion on the list), we have asked the draft authors to put together a summary of key open issues/questions, to send their summary  to the list, and then to lead a discussion on these issues during our meeting at IETF 117.  Please do feel free to continue the discussion on the list. We are particularly interested in hearing from those who have not yet voiced their opinions - both on list, and in the meeting.

We appreciate all who have contributed over this extended effort - notably those who have spent many hours in the regular working meetings.

Thank you,
Lou and Kent

> On May 8, 2023, at 6:49 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> Dear NETMOD WG,
> 
> This message begins a joint two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-11 and draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-09
> ending on Monday, May 22nd.  Neither draft has IPR declared.  Here are the direct links to the HTML version for these drafts:
> 
>   - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-11
>   - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-09
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!  This is useful and important, even from authors.  Objections, concerns, and suggestions are also welcomed at this time.
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent and Lou (chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod