IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 20 February 2018 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD3912D94E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:06:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqU3aVQHpLLT for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836EF126CB6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108157.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1KGwrMo032739; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:06:20 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=g+6ObomNggwgBPMUYmnjeoCsjYlANHc8zQMi2xcdBlE=; b=aHiqoVnydTvN3bTiGR9SsuaCg4nAzRQirE07XsC6PTi815D5o/+SAZkczyWhNKfKnOfw gE8Bc9R7pG1/KloZYU2M2h/aUBesoOct+xg4I4F8vQAbAz2FWntS0AR/QBlKIMZospMB Uf0NqnXFsYeGZ+smXO8LHSYGHzGub9o9Ha3lnt3ix5keepxdBMMCzIq48J0jmPJZy7Q/ xIe69OXSyhigI2TAFXyWv2w+dfiA1FVOEmxMagUv5OYPjnlACzdRukzUiAw7KD7UTlyT f8+mLE+Di/cD/Fj7PiPWfuP258A8OaBymgvSAReZn4AOC40QR6zDcFD1zyNgskY3JJzg pQ==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp0052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.52]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g8qecg1g2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 09:06:19 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3113.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.527.6; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:06:18 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::507:f464:b89a:c64b]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::507:f464:b89a:c64b%2]) with mapi id 15.20.0527.014; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:06:18 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20
Thread-Index: AQHTpZZd5Geu+8X2WUq2NsIzPrmhNqOj3UoAgAmtrxX//7BHAA==
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:06:18 +0000
Message-ID: <A8296BCA-A33F-44EB-AB94-706A7D4B5BE7@juniper.net>
References: <d4a73a00-dce2-2f11-29d0-0eb34920fd3f@cisco.com> <922E608D-951A-459A-B515-B53834C805C1@juniper.net> <022001d3aa6a$c31895e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <022001d3aa6a$c31895e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3113; 7:mP/LPswagS5hqin+TpBEhG0a6WQUvRZCsuIqw7bHNxAWAJdtHLbCgfjZ4Xc6TyX+Hb/SMIEqKULTsk6c5dC1VrACzaNyFg9C8fgv4WNlUr3pV5LdzkGmskTDK2NAUR4zG+3SHS94hlQiIeK91+MxCP3U1eT7WzC20++50KnXhz1cKlJ98jnpsSSJUF+S3GGsgjzLt9hC84rgUSMN1qeNNrc1cD/K4z5U8MxlgRdVFS+7JBIbwld0ADUlv9oMWcxe
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f8243487-7ac0-429a-2f2a-08d578844245
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3113:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3113791128BC9C9A390EAA99A5CF0@DM5PR05MB3113.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(10436049006162)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231101)(944501161)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201703031522075)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113;
x-forefront-prvs: 05891FB07F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(39380400002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(66066001)(3660700001)(6486002)(99286004)(3846002)(2900100001)(26005)(83716003)(6116002)(105586002)(33656002)(2950100002)(6512007)(6246003)(82746002)(53936002)(6436002)(3280700002)(7736002)(76176011)(305945005)(575784001)(8666007)(86362001)(6306002)(25786009)(8936002)(102836004)(53546011)(110136005)(5660300001)(58126008)(6506007)(5250100002)(68736007)(186003)(97736004)(14454004)(966005)(81156014)(81166006)(229853002)(2906002)(106356001)(36756003)(316002)(8676002)(478600001)(296002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: C+q3Icn524BFv6XMFvbkpRiA1/l4Mc3tyhbzFuPbWGcbRVAsknIZf9NC9aDxTUTXB055itCzI6NGAkvvIEKyJRULLRKicQwGBED6hQvXWZkYxsGaBDUPtze6orMrP9kfWHpAwjj0Oy4fx6kz20eNFxnWir9S4lH9pykGr7iGrWg=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BF809FB61D1BB44EA31A7737A2BCB916@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f8243487-7ac0-429a-2f2a-08d578844245
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Feb 2018 17:06:18.4858 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3113
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-02-20_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802200209
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/wMnrBfXMNE5-CHWYyiQD64B08OE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:06:25 -0000



> Kent
> 
> You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to.
>
> The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams
> should be an Informative Reference.
>
> Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC number
> is assigned.
> 
> Therefore, a note asking the I-D reference to be updated to reflect the
> assigned RFC number is null - the RFC can be published with the
> reference as an i-d and not as an RFC which is what I expect the RFC
> Editor to do.
> 
> QED


Except I know that this draft will be stuck in MISREF state and tree-diagrams
will in fact be assigned an RFC number by the time this draft is published.

K.


> Note that this is not the case of a Normative i-d reference being buried
> in the YANG module and not being.noticed by the RFC Editor; that problem
> I am content with.
>
>
>Tom Petch








>
> Please also address these issues when posting -21 to address Benoit's
issues.  Please post -21 ASAP as Benoit has already placed this draft on
the IESG telechat in a couple weeks.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // shepherd
>
>
> On 2/14/18, 8:18 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of
bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned.
> Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro
>
>    The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management
>
>    Datastore Architecture defined in
I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores.
>
>
> - As mentioned in the writeup, [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams]
should be an informative reference, not normative.
>
> - Editorial:
> OLD:
> This draft addresses the common leafs
> NEW:
> This document addresses the common leafs
>
> Please publish a new version asap.
> In the mean time, I'm sending this draft to IETF LC.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cJ7MVnQVc1hgxpVF7oYiVn6Rbm-Qf2dDyrfYhL-s9io&s=u0Hn9GkO-B0jUGm1MnIQ4x4AgIZNXHBIaZhTPmt3dC8&e=
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email