Re: [newtrk] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt

[Pekka Savola <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Since none of these were copied to the WG, here is
> a compilation of the Last Call comments, including responses
> to IANA's question.
>
> I request the authors and WG to reach consensus on
>
> 1. whether to remove the 5 RFCs mentioned by Orly from the list
> (note his second message at the end that only mentions two of them).

I support removing 1471, 1472, 1473 from the list; PPP-related MIBs 
could be used more widely now and in the future as well.

I disagree with 1381, 1382 -- these are MIBs on X.25.  I doubt anyone 
is building new products with these; the fact that they're supported 
in existing products does not take these "away" in any sense.  But if 
folks want to remove them from the list, I don't object.

> 2. how to respond to IANA

The best seems to keep the reference to the existing RFCs but add a 
note like '(Historic, see RFC XXXX)' beside the assignments.
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html